Europe
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
view the rest of the comments
I don't get it, didn't Russia do exactly what the US is doing a preventive bombarding? Is today opposite day?
You do realise Iran is direclty supplying weapons to Russia that are used against Ukraine. Did you really expect for Ukraine to side with Iran here? It seems a lot of people are forgetting what a shitty country Iran actually is ...
Israel also supplied Drones to Russia after the Crimea invasion, didn't join sanctions and as reported by an Ukrainian official demanded Ukraine to surrender behind closed doors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93Russia_relations
Now with the US getting itself dragged into another Iraq style war by Israel, Ukraine could suffer in two major ways:
Ukraine is being played by the US and Israel but either plays along because Zelensky is high on Zionism or because Ukraine by now is owned by the US and he has to say everything Trump wants him to say. Either way this is bad for the Ukrainian people and it is delusional to think that anyone in the West would feel emboldened now to bomb Russia.
Zelensky is high on Zionism, wtf does that imply?
Zelensky seems to be an ardent supporter of Israel and by extension its grave breaches of international law and humanitarian law. For Zelensky it seems that Israel is the victim as it carries out ethnic cleansing, occupation and Apartheid.
By siding with the oppressor he undermines the legitimacy of Ukraines rightful call against oppression and violation of international law. As Zelensky is undermining his owns countries position it seems that he is ideologically Zionist.
Now he has sided with the attackers again, which undermines his and Ukraines position even further. The question is: Is Israel more important to Zelensky than the rules under which Ukraine is protected from Russias aggression?
https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/russia-ukraine-war-israel-palestine-zelensky-support-disgrace
https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/russia-ukraine-war-israel-palestine-zelensky-support-disgrace
....
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-palestine-war-ukraine-zelensky-denied-visit
....
I don’t know, sounds pretty much like Zelensky’s high on nationalism. And of course he is. Like almost everyone. And so we should also know how all emerging nation states will sort out their ethnic membership as their very first measure. You know, like it was handled in Yugoslavia with helpful support by the German government, incessantly concerned about the Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Völker. Why is that always being viewed as something exclusive to Israel? There the sorting just isn’t finished yet. If we want to get rid of nation states, do we have to start with Israel? Is it really more criminal than others?
It doesn’t seem surprising that Zelensky sees an ally in another so called beleaguered nation and considers it an example. And yeah, the Israeli allies betray Ukraine just as the European and American ones.
Being high on Zionism just sounds like magic or: a certain form of gossip.
I'll say most Ukrainians wish both sides "best of luck" (source: I'm Ukrainian) - to Israel because they supplied Lancet and Orlan technologies to Russia, to Iran because they supplied Shaheds and ballistic missiles to Russia, so these things are what directly impacted our lives and made them much worse.
As for why Zelensky sings praises for Taco Don from time to time - I don't believe that latter one can be swayed to help Ukraine (and Zelensky probably doesn't believe that too) but there's still Congress, that is somewhat cooperative from time to time, and we really need these sanctions that Taco Don now tries to delay and dilute.
This is clear whataboutism. Iran and Israel can both be bad. Ukraine wants max pressure on the Russian war machine. So they cheer the weakening of a Russian military supplier. They also probably figure that if America is itching to fight again, it might as well help them out. They also probably sense the news cycle further shifting away from Ukraine and are trying to bring themselves into the conversation.
Israel started the attacks on Iran and the US joined in. The US diverted 20,000 anti drone missiles from Ukraine to the region instead. Zelensky already remarked that this will lead to more losses. Zelensky is playing in a game that is set to make Ukraine loose even more and it is crucial to understand that Israel is not a friend of Ukraine and will not leave any opportunity for its own benefit, no matter the cost for Ukraine.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/23/as-israel-iran-war-escalates-ukraine-fears-more-losses-to-russia
That was 11 year ago... Things change, and will change again. When someone is at war you have to look for the help you can get now, not how things were or will be. Stalin was worse than Hitler, but the US supported Stalin in WWII because Hitler was attacking.
That's a really bad take.
Yes, people on previously Soviet-occupied territories that were occupied by Germans in WW2 often first met nazis with flowers as liberators, and even captured Soviet generals would at first slip some words that were quite critical of Soviet leadership.
But, as time passed on, the attitudes changed, so there was increase in guerilla activity and also some initial collaborators became rebels. That is simply because people started realizing how nazis were worse than anything.
it is possible for two opposing sides to be evil. If one evil is oppressing you that is the one you fight against but that doesn't mean you support the other. It is even possible for the worse evil to not oppress you as much.
This whole world war 3 bullshittery is hurting my brain
I keep wondering what our "Archduke Ferdinand" event will be, or if it has already happened.
Are you calling bombing and terrorizing of Ukrainian civilians for "preventive bombarding" ?
That is what Russia is calling its actions in Ukraine and your description of bombing and terrorizing Civilians both is true for Israel/US genocide in Gaza and the recent attacks on Iran, which have killed hundred of Civilians and hit hospitals, schools, journalists...
Ukraines government is either so backed against the wall or stupid to embrace these actions by Israel and the US, by which it legitimizes similar attacks on Ukrainian civilians.
But Ukraine is not "part of the club". Before the fullscale Russian invasion a lot of western sentiment was basically Ukraine being the same as Russia and part of "the other". And when the war eventually ends, the same will happen again quickly. The sad reality is that Ukraine has very little "friends" on the geopolitical stage.
Probably this. They can start worrying about morality and integrity once their existence is no longer on the line. I don't blame them for prioritising their own survival.
Are you judging Russia based on their propaganda?
I don't condone the bombing of Iran, but the 2 situations are so far from similar your comparison is idiotic.
Ukraine is stupid to engage in the same propaganda rhetoric to please its "allies" that Russia uses to justify its attacks on Ukraine. It is bullshit in either cases and Ukraine weakens its position to call out bullshit legitimately by parroting the same talking points in a different constellation. This is especially true as Zelensky kept comparing Israel to Ukraine and with this comparison boosting Russias allegations of Ukrainian war crimes.
How is it similar if Ukraine see preventing Iran from having nukes as a legitimate target?
Ukraine gave up their nukes against guarantees that USA would help protect them.
Then Russia invades anyway in 2014, Because they want Crimea.
And Obama says to Ukraine they are on their own.
Then in 2022 Russia invade again, despite Ukraine is not in any way threatening Russia.
And Biden makes some half-assed support for Ukraine, giving them support, but only just enough to maintain a stalemate.
It is clearly no wonder why Ukraine want USA to make good on their promise, but USA is a shit country you can't rely on. It's n0ot just Trump, it's actually 3 presidents, and 2 of them were democratic.
But there is no way you can claim Ukraine is parroting Russia in this, the difference is that Iran is trying to get nukes, and Ukraine gave up theirs for protection.
But clearly the advice to Iran must be to get those nukes as fast as they freakingly can, because they can't trust Israel and USA to not attack unless they have them.
The IAEA said there was no evidence of that. The CIA said since their first assessment in 2007 Iran has not been seeking to develop nuclear weapons. An assessment that was reconfirmed in the 2025 intelligence report.
It was a lie and everyone knows it is a lie, except for the people gullible enough to follow the propaganda.
This was three days before the full scale invasion by Russia into Ukraine:
It is exactly the same play. "There is weapons of mass destructions. We need to prevent that!" Iran was neither threatening the US nor Israel with attacks and only responded to Israel attacks in 2024. Zelensky knows that. The knows that he is forsaking international law and truth in the hopes he would get some scraps.
So far I don't think the US strikes specifically on Iran are known to have killed or even wounded anyone, let alone civilians, nor hit hospitals or schools, right?
The US is providing weapons and intelligence for Israel to have targeted these places in Iran though. Furthermore the US is defending Israel against Iranian counterattacks so i would not distinguish the US from Israel in terms of responsibility.
Yeah but I don't think anyone was referring to Israel's actions as the US doing "preventative bombing"?
Even if they did kill someone it would be someone working in someway with nuclear materials. (including the person who cleans the bathroom there though)
Setting aside that they hit residential areas, what is that supposed to prove? Are scientists now valid military targets? Should Iran bomb Tel Aviv University? Are nuclear power plants now fair game in war?
I'm referring to the US, not Isreal. AFAIK the US only hit nuclear facilities, and anyone who would have died there was thus working in a nuclear facility.
Though Iran has been bombing Isreal residential areas for a long time - not directly, but they have been funding all the groups who have been sending bombs, morters, and everything else. Iran just deserves a share of the blame for Gaza genocide as if they were not enabling the attacks, Isreal would not be as interested in such attacks. (how much is not knowable, but there is a share for sure)
Okay, and? To repeat myself, are scientists now valid military targets? Should Iran bomb Tel Aviv University? Are nuclear power plants fair game in war?
That... is completely false. Like have you seen what they're doing to the pretty much completely submissive West Bank? All pretense of Israel acting in self-defense is pure fiction. Palestinians have the right to resist Israeli oppression by whatever means necessary.
Factories making military equipment have always been valid targets. Obviously I can't know for sure every site was working on nuclear weapons, but those that were are fair targets as far as I know.
Whether or not it was a good move is an entirely different thing though.
That is what Russia was calling it from the start.