this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
232 points (97.2% liked)

politics

23984 readers
3727 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, on Thursday said his company SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft after he engaged in an extraordinary public fallout with Donald Trump who had threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk’s businesses.

“In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,” Musk posted on the social media platform X, which he owns.

A few minutes earlier Trump had posted on Truth Social – the media platform that he owns – that he might cancel huge lucrative contracts with Musk’s businesses, which include the SpaceX company that is building a fleet of rockets.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 39 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Say goodbye to human spaceflight for an entire generation. We made a huge mistake hitching everything onto this fucker's stuff.

I've been waiting for us to leave LEO since I was a kid in the 80s and it now looks like I might be dying without ever having witnessed even a moon landing. I envy my parents.

Unless China or India or Russia pull something off. They're all we have after this.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Can't the admin simply seize SpaceX, if it is that important to "national security"? If elon complains, deport him and nationalize his stuff on the grounds that he got his citizenship under illegal pretenses (illegal immigrant).

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They certainly could. I don’t think it’s a terrible idea either - Elon is not stable enough to handle the decision making for national security tech.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

I mean, the current national security advisor doesn't seem stable enough to handle the decision making either. It's unsurprising that E-Mu fit in fine with this administration until recently.

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I find that less likely than an investor and board of directors revolt at SpaceX.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

SpaceX is a private company. Musk has total control over it.

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They have many private investors.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Investors can't remove Musk from SpaceX who is the majority owner. They can sue to recover their investment money or be awarded assets in case of bankruptcy.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you mean for the west. China has its own rockets and space station and I imagine they aren't stopping just cause SpaceX decided to shoot itself in the foot.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you mean for America. Europe has its own programs and they’re only ramping them up.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Most of Europe is at war with the only European country who's gotten people into space. Russia certainly doesn't have the money or capacity to work on manned space operations right now and while the rest of Europe may be working on it, they might get there.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was talking about ESA. They have the capability with the Arianne 6 to get people into space.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I can't find anything about crewed flights. The best I found was this article.

This Wiki mentions planned manned flights for Ariane, but maybe they've done something recently?

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

China is already testing a starship clone.

We've seen it works. It can be reengineered. Not that they'd be allowed to just ignore their contract like that. They'd forcefully remove the company from him before that happened.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

China is killing it honestly. My money is actually on them for next boots on the moon.

[–] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Shades of The Martian are coming to mind for me.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ironic that the man convinced he was going to take humanity to Mars just set back humanity's interplanetary expansion by a generation.

Maybe what we've lost with this mistake will balance out by teaching us that autocrats/oligarchs don't serve us but it's hard to imagine it at this point.