Gsus4

joined 1 year ago
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

What makes you think trimp can't do this?

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But do they have "canaries" that allow the user to verify they are indeed doing that?

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you can't even do the most basic thing to help push the tiniest bit to prevent the worst from happening to you, why would anyone else care?

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

They were courting anyone from the political spectrum who was still a constitutionalist, lefties included, to unite against whatever trump's mood happens to be that day.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

They also want to turn universities into PragerU types.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Yea, secret voting can be a way to launder your responsibility, by contributing to make someone else responsible for what you want to do.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yea, but at least the proportional representation systems in Europe were delaying them a bit to cut off a few hostile actors, create defenses...now it is coming from the most important ally the disinfo storm is going to reach cat 6 :(

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

...but why? What do they gain from it?

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And throws anyone caught in public with a palestinian flag in jail...they really showed it to genocide Joe.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

But the "economy" on paper is indeed fine, there is just itty detail that it doesn't trickle down to most voters, who will then seek shelter from these madmen with the other idiot they find selling an even worse alternative...

It's so inflexible that the american system only enables two parties.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

well, yea, thats how voting works :/ people who voted for Kamala don't deserve what is coming...but it's better than a civil war...probably.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

trump's clown show is really good at disguising how dangerous he and his syncophants are, so the message that constitutional conservatives, liberals and the left must unite to beat him (e.g. France) looked like it made no sense.

"Why are these mortal enemies banding together just against this harmless cooky former president? Such drama queens."

Now we watch leopards eat everyone's faces, but his voters' faces will be fine to watch be eaten.

 

autotranslated:

Faced with the lack of a legal representative of the social network X in Brazil, the minister of the Supreme Court (STF) Alexandre de Moraes blocked accounts of the company Starlink Holding, which also belongs to billionaire Elon Musk – which provoked a new reaction from the businessman (read more below)

Last week, Moraes considered the existence of a “de facto economic group” under Musk and, on August 18, ordered the blocking of all the financial values of this group in Brazil, to guarantee the payment of fines imposed by the Brazilian Justice against Rede X.

According to aides to the office of Minister Alexandre de Moraes, the other company under Elon Musk in the country – in addition to the X – is precisely Starlink, which operates in Brazil in the sale of internet services by satellite, especially in the North region.

What Starlink is and how does it work

Elon Musk compares Alexandre de Moraes to movie villains

All Starlink leaders in Brazil have already been notified and subpoenaed to also answer for the amounts due to the Brazilian Justice by X.

After the blockade of the accounts, the billionaire returned to criticize Alexandre de Moraes - whom, on Wednesday (28), compared to villains of films (see video above).

In a publication in X on Thursday (29), Musk called the minister "dictator" and said that President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) is conniving with him.

“The tyrant Alexandre [de Moraes] is the dictator of Brazil. Lula is his dog,” Musk wrote in a free translation.

The businessman Elon Musk decided, according to announced on the 17th, to close the X office in Brazil.

The reason is the fact that the company does not agree with the fines imposed by the Supreme Court or with the determination of withdrawal of content published by users on the social network that confront the Democratic State of Law and Brazilian legislation.

Since then, Minister Alexandre de Moraes has gone on to request the businessman to establish a legal representative to officially answer for the acts of the platform. O processo de Elon Musk contra megaempresas por suposto 'boicote' ao X — Foto: Getty Images

Elon Musk’s lawsuit against mega-companies for alleged ‘boicote’ to X — Photo: Getty Images

The subpoena in post

On Wednesday (28), Moraes gave 24 hours so that the social network again has a legal representative in the country, under penalty of suspension of service.

The decision was released overnight, in a post on the STF’s profile on X, in response to the company’s post made on August 17 about the closure of the office. On that occasion, in addition to announcing the closure of the office and the withdrawal of its representative from the country, the platform informed that the network would continue to be used in the country.

24
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Gsus4@mander.xyz to c/aww@lemmy.world
view more: next ›