this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
259 points (95.8% liked)

Games

38887 readers
924 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

Platform specific

Game specific

Language specific

Others

PM a mod to add your own

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No less than is correct because they know the exact number they have sold.

If you've sold less than 1,000 units then you have sold a number of units that is under 1,000.

If you have sold fewer than 1,000 units you have not sold 1,000 units but you're not sure how many units you have sold just that that number didn't reach 1,000.

But they do know how many units they sold, otherwise they wouldn't know if they had sold less than 1,000 so it is "less than".

[โ€“] Subverb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

No, that's wrong.

The "less than" vs "fewer than" rule isn't about whether you know the exact number - it's about countable vs uncountable nouns.

Video game copies are countable, so it's traditionally "fewer than 1,000 units" regardless of whether you know the precise number sold.

That said, it's been misused so much that it's become more flexible, and "less than" with numbers is widely accepted now.

Don't take my word for it, Google it.