this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
167 points (99.4% liked)

Android

19066 readers
671 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 76 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I realize that I'm an asshole for telling them what to do but here's what they need to do: They should drop all development of their own Android and put significant resources to making their next phone work with GrapheneOS.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

That would make their already very expensive phone even more expensive, if it were even possible at all.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That problem with that is the Graphene devs

Probably better to make something for the general population. If nothing else maybe work with Calyx OS or /e/os

[–] compostgoblin@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago

Murena ships Fairphones with /e/os in the US

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Agreed. Graphene is a fantastic product, but the devs are absolutely insufferable.

[–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 5 points 23 hours ago

I'd heard about it as a secure, pro privacy ROM but never used it since it's not available on my current device. But after seeing their attitude on some forums, it honestly put me right off ever wanting to try Graphene OS.

I'm glad it's not just me

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Even ignoring that I tried graphene but even as a tech person it was off putting. Calyx in contrast has a nice blend of usability and security imo.

I wanted to like graphene and it's far superior in security but just so much less usable IMO. I'd rather move to a Linux phone at that point.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

What do you mean by "much less usable"? It's pretty much AOSP in terms of the UX, for better or worse.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Graphene doesn't support MicroG which is a deal breaker for me

Well apparently their "approach" is to run sandboxed Google play. Now whether that is better than microg with its more anonymous nature but higher permission level, idk.

But that locks you into Google play and using an account of some sort rather than just using Aurora. From what I remember anyhow, especially when trying to use seedvault since graphene has no backup solution of its own even years after saying seedvault isn't great.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

No, the hardware of Fairphones lacks certain security features.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 32 points 2 days ago (5 children)

That'd make them even more of a niche option than right now, since some apps (most notably banking) will just refuse to work.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

By working with the real hardware vendor, they could apply for the certification, thus making the apps requiring the useless stamp from google work again.

Well, except for those apps that specifically tries to blacklist graphene. Looking at you, Revolut!

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

Banking apps generally speaking work, it's the NFC payments via google pay that don't and probably never will.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

Most of them work fine. Typically don't have to even enable compatibility mode.

Although Google's new Play Integrity API is breaking more apps every day.

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

On the contrary; many people want GrapheneOS but don't want a Google phone.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

What most people don't seem to understand is that every Android phone is a Google phone unless you go through the degooglification.

I would (and did) just use Apple phones if it weren't for GrapheneOS.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Define most people

Lemmy isn't exactly a great representation of the general populous

[–] sol@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Many do, and many want something else. Personally the uncertainty around banking apps working is what keeps me away from GrapheneOS.

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 2 days ago

Well, mine work. I haven't found a single app that doesn't.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And, like I said, that's a niche.

I'd love to use GrapheneOS myself, but unfortunately too many apps I need won't work on it.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven't found any apps that don't work with the proper permissions enabled.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Do you use sandboxed google play? If not you must you mostly open source apps.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yes I do but no, that's not correct, most apps in Play Store work fine without Play Services.

they could probably just extend it with the bits that google requires for corporate approval, and release that as a fork, while still contributing to the development of base graphene os.

I mean they don't need to use plain graphene, a partnership could make things easier for both parties by avoiding needless duplication of efforts.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Most banking apps work with a simple app setting change

[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm one of the lucky ones, where Lloyds' app will not work with GrapheneOS. At all.

Its kind of a pain in the ass, but ultimately its the only app, so its OK. The only other issue is the lack of NFC payment support for my bank card. But I have magsafe case and wallet, so carry my card with my phone.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

I always been a bit skeptical of storing my credit card info on my phones, I still prefer keeping and using the actual card lol

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And what simple setting is that? I have multiple apps that don't work because their app developers use Google as the security verification, which is very common with banking apps.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/8330-app-compatibility-with-grapheneos

Exploit protection compatibility mode worked for every app that didn't work out of the box for me

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's crazy. It didn't work for any of the banking apps I tried it with. Maybe I'll give it another try since it's been a while.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://privsec.dev/posts/android/banking-applications-compatibility-with-grapheneos/

Here's more info on which apps are compatible, definitely worth double checking that all the ones you use are on the list

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks for all the info. I did some testing and a bunch of apps that didn't work before are now working. Not everything, but a lot more than before.

they are already actively working with e/OS and iodΓ©OS. Don't know if e/OS already supports Android 15 like iodΓ© does, but they could just focus on that next release...