this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
756 points (99.1% liked)

196

3256 readers
1690 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nuclear threats never went away. There's a proxy war between nuclear powers happening right now. India and Pakistan just had a spat. Seems like some American elites want to fight China.

Sometimes I wonder if nuclear winter will cancel out climate change.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Yeah but in 1984 we really worried that we might not make it through the week.

Weird Al released Christmas at ground zero in '86

Now we don't really believe Russia's missiles will even work

And back then there was no credible defence

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

there's no practical defence against nukes

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yes there is, you just blow it up while it's in space

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

you would need something silly like 50x more interceptors than ICBMs and SLBMs and these are more expensive and technically harder than either

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

As someone with experience in this field, I can tell you with utmost certainty that the missiles the West fired at ICBMs are certainly not more expensive or technically harder than either of the aforementioned missiles. ICBMs in particular are almost a non threat to the world

[–] psud@aussie.zone -2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Wikipedia disagrees, though notes that there are weapons that can beat current defence technology

The Soviet Union could produce enough missiles to overwhelm any defence. Russia now couldn't afford to maintain a large arsenal, though China can. China doesn't seem as likely to launch a first strike as the USSR did.

Of course those systems aren't protecting you unless you live somewhere important

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 1 points 21 hours ago

What? You can't say wikipedia disagrees when it lists weapons that can beat current defenses.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 1 points 21 hours ago

The NMD program is limited in scope and designed to counter a relatively small ICBM attack from a less sophisticated adversary.

also ground-based interceptor is more expensive than ICBM, and you need one for each warhead and maybe also for decoys, and probably more than one to be reasonably sure. since everyone operates under MAD it doesn't matter if you destroy most probable adversary's nukes on the ground or in the air, so that's one of reasons why ICBMs are a thing, and then SLBMs as a second line. cue arms race. ABM are considered destabilizing and are limited by treaties

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
  1. those missiles will work. They have been modernizing.

  2. There still is no credible defense to a full on attack by Russia. Trump's golden dome is as real as Reagan's star wars.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Actually modernizing? Or modernizing in the way that the T-14 and SU-57 technically exist?

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 hours ago

They're using this little one in Ukraine, but that aside, would you like to call their bluff if you think their missles don't work? I'd rather this shitshow continue than play real life fallout.

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Remember that the united states and russia were routinely inspecting the nuclear arsenals of each other. They may have been hiding how bad things were, but we can be certain they do have functioning nuclear weapons at a scale large enough to matter.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

The US believed Kiev would fall in weeks, tops. I'm not putting much faith in their assessment of Russia's arsenal. If anything, it's in the best interest of the US MIC to lie about it and spend to fill imaginary capabilities gaps as we so often have.

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

ground zero in '86

Crazy how many times the World Trade Center musta been attacked by Weird Al. I only heard about ’93 and, of course, ’911.