741
Jon Stewart on CNN’s Biden book: ‘Selling you a book about news they should have told you’
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
741 points (98.2% liked)
politics
23593 readers
2954 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No genuinely, what is your point? Bernie has been arrested for marching for Civil Rights in the 1960s. https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-4406890016
So Bernie having a long track record is bad, but Trump tricking America using Russian assistance is good? Like what is the point here? Trump 9 years of running, Bernie in office for a while, therefore Bernie bad?
In less then a decade Trump took over the states completely with his movement and your response to that is Bernie started twenty years before I gave him credit for it?
And that's a victory in your eyes?
In all metrics Trump has achieved more in nine years then Bernie has in sixty.
So your advocating for more politicians to be more like trump and less like Bernie. Is that your point.
If by that you mean effective then yes.
So most effective equals most good. There's a old saying about that you know. It doesn't generally turn out well. "The ends justify the means". You wanna "efficiently" discuss eliminating the homeless problem' or any other minority you or someone else might find inconvenient. This won't go well and you know it. I a ant Bernie to be more effective too but this is a systemic user issue. We the people have/had the power to control this and stupid has won the day. Right wing authoritarian leaders are a PEBKAC issue.
Yes in politics the most effective usually get the most votes and the progressives could learn from it.
Liberals (like yourself) with a hate boner for progressives are largely indistinguishable from Trump supporters these days. It's hilarious.
Is it because we vote or is it because we don’t spend all our time telling other people they aren’t left enough to be part of our cause?
So how many progressives didn't vote this time around? Give us a number.
More then one and I can be pretty confident in that.