this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
1059 points (96.5% liked)

memes

14835 readers
5308 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

That's an interesting thought, but I believe it to simply be a coincidence.

The base 12 counting being based on counting the division of your fingers is historically verified, but if the division aspect was so compelling to them you'd expect it to carry forward into their writing system.

By the time you get cuneiform math though, they actually go back to base 10.

https://images.app.goo.gl/9GR6VEiT7GHYF3KaA

As you can see base 12 is not in the written system, or for written mathematics. It just was convenient for counting on their hands.

They used mixes of base 10/base 12 and base 60.

Base 10 would be used go determine the symbols for a specific "digit" in base 60.

So similar to how our 13 is 1 ten and 3 ones, their 13 was the symbol for 10 then 3 symbols for 1. 13 = ๐’Œ‹๐’น๐’น๐’น But 73 would be written ๐’น ๐’Œ‹๐’น๐’น๐’น

Which would be interpreted as 1 sixty and 13 ones, or 60 + 13

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'ma start a revolution where we use duodecimal metric for everything, including time.

[โ€“] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's how we ended up with 12 months of varying length in a year and it's a mess.

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It's a problem no matter how you divide the year

That's why I propose changing the orbit of the earth, too

[โ€“] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Not if you divide by 5. It gets you 73 days each.

13 months of 4 weeks + new year's day (+leap day) actually fits perfectly.