this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
913 points (96.3% liked)

memes

14835 readers
4842 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 43 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

AIUI there was an aspect in the divisibility of the numbers being convenient.

12 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6. 60 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, and 30.

10 is divisible by 2 and 5. 100 is divisible by 2, 4, 5, 10, 20, 25, and 50.

If you want to minimize dealing with fractions, 12 and 60 are far more convenient than 10 and 100.

[โ€“] WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

That's an interesting thought, but I believe it to simply be a coincidence.

The base 12 counting being based on counting the division of your fingers is historically verified, but if the division aspect was so compelling to them you'd expect it to carry forward into their writing system.

By the time you get cuneiform math though, they actually go back to base 10.

https://images.app.goo.gl/9GR6VEiT7GHYF3KaA

As you can see base 12 is not in the written system, or for written mathematics. It just was convenient for counting on their hands.

They used mixes of base 10/base 12 and base 60.

Base 10 would be used go determine the symbols for a specific "digit" in base 60.

So similar to how our 13 is 1 ten and 3 ones, their 13 was the symbol for 10 then 3 symbols for 1. 13 = ๐’Œ‹๐’น๐’น๐’น But 73 would be written ๐’น ๐’Œ‹๐’น๐’น๐’น

Which would be interpreted as 1 sixty and 13 ones, or 60 + 13

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'ma start a revolution where we use duodecimal metric for everything, including time.

[โ€“] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That's how we ended up with 12 months of varying length in a year and it's a mess.

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 minutes ago

It's a problem no matter how you divide the year

That's why I propose changing the orbit of the earth, too