this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
273 points (96.6% liked)

politics

23557 readers
3754 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A progressive dnc

It's not a progressive DNC, even tho it is the most progressive chair in 50+ years

It's a nonbiased DNC, and that's all progressive politicians have ever needed: a fair fight.

We’re past waiting for the DNC to realize their role and take up the mantle to save America, they were given that opportunity and chose over and over to instead be the party that delivered us into collapse.

You're thinking of the DNC as a single entity and not ~500 voting members...

Most of which had been there for a very long time and are now slowly dying off or less often retiring and giving their seat/vote up.

The true hope is within your community with the people who will actually show up and fight for you

Those are the type of people they've been getting replaced with, it's been a long process and has taken decades of a grass roots movement to accomplish.

I've been waiting for this since I was a kid and watched the DNC close ranks to protect Bill Clinton for lying under oath.

I'm gonna give it more than 3 months before declaring it a failure.

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll agree to give it another 3 months and see where we are, and I appreciate you not getting bogged down in the minutia and sticking to broad strokes. Like I said, I believe we are envisioning the same future and I dont want you to think I am fighting against you. My first election was 2016, so I'm a bit more cynical. I have less optimism for those 500 members to seize the moment instead of entrenching their dying position one last time. Could it happen? Sure. I just feel it's equally as likely that a grassroots movement takes its place. I hope for the sake of the country you're right.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

I’ll agree to give it another 3 months and see where we are

I mean...

The only way anything will change before midterms is if a handful of Republicans break from trump and flip the House or Senate.

That's why AOC and Bernie are touring red districts and telling them to contact their Republican reps.

It's very unlikely to work, but makes beating them in midterms more likely since the Republicans aren't helping their voters now.

So 3 more months?

Not trying to crush your hopes but it needs a longer timeline.

Personally I'm cautiously optimistic, but the midterm primaries is where we'll really know what Martin's DNC is like. But every sign so far has been a good one.