this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
535 points (98.5% liked)

News

29354 readers
3097 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Harris poll for Guardian finds people reconsidering major life events such as having children or buying a home

Americans are reconsidering major life events including marriage, having children and buying a home amid economic anxiety in the opening months of the Trump presidency, according to an exclusive poll for the Guardian.

Six in 10 Americans said the economy has affected at least one of their major life goals, according to the Harris poll, citing either lack of affordability or anxiety around the current economy.

Though Donald Trump’s tariff policies have only been in place for a few weeks, and though he has temporarily walked back on some of his harshest policies, the findings are a sign that Trump’s economic agenda could have long-term effects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

These polls are misleading. 4 in 10 Americans have always supported Trump regardless of what he does. That hasn't changed.

Maybe it's significant that he's lost support from the other 2 in 10 who voted for him, but if they seriously thought that he was the best candidate during the 2024 election, then their opinions aren't based on critical thinking either.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

4 in 10 who actually vote. Trump only ever won ~30% of the popular vote when you count all of the people who couldn’t bother to get off the couch. If “Didn’t Vote” was a candidate, it would have won by a landslide.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Didn't vote means one of at least three things:

"I think the candidate i support will win anyways."
"I don't care who wins, i will be fine with any of the likely possible candidates."
"I don't feel represented by anyone but i feel powerless to get someone on the ballot who represents me."

Unless specifically polling non voters about the reason why they didn't vote we can't really tell.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There’s also the hidden fourth option: “I was disenfranchised by republicans, who made voting extremely difficult and/or prohibitively expensive.”

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“While the law says that my employer must let me off to go vote, pointing out that fact does not protect me from getting fired in retaliation anyway in an at-will state.”

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is still possible to win wrongful termination suits in at-will states.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Got any lawyers?

I got fired in retaliation for asking for accommodations and pointing out Title 9 violations. That’s not supposed to happen, but lawyers don’t work for free.

Just like your spouse isn’t supposed to be able to kick you out, refuse to file for divorce and drain your bank account. But justice in America costs money.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

You need to find lawyers in your area that specialize in employment law. They'll usually work on contingency. They'd hardly ever have any cases at all if they didn't.

It helps if you have something like old emails for proof that you asked.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

You're missing one: "The Republicans successfully prevented me from being able to vote"

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Many skip voting because they perceive that their state will always vote for the opposite canidate.

It's a big flaw with the electoral college. It should just be a popular vote

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When do you expect the 1/3rd of the country that has never voted to magically show up to vote?

I don’t, for a variety of reasons. Whether it’s apathy, feeling like their vote doesn’t matter, or just outright disenfranchisement, the non-voting block is pretty reliable in that they simply don’t vote.

What changes from one election to the next is more focused on which people don’t vote. If there’s a hot topic that someone cares about, they’ll be more likely to jump through hoops in order to actually cast a ballot. The percentage of non-voters remains relatively stable, but the demographics of those non-voters tends to shift over time. So if one party can incite a particular group to vote, that’s usually considered a win.

You see it with voting pushes all the time. Souls to the polls, the league of women voters, felon re-enfranchisement groups, etc… All focused on getting different demographics to actually vote, because those particular demographics (whatever they are) tend to align with the group’s political beliefs.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

When they have someone worth voting for.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You guys keep bringing this up as if the day when those non-voters start voting for Democrats is right around the corner. The percentage of people who don't vote hasn't changed much in 100 years. Quit wasting words on people who will never matter in this context.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Literally every single election the talking point is how many people didn't bother to vote. And it's always the same percentage. The only time it changed much at all was after Trump killed a few million Americans with his COVID policies. The only way to make any change more is to have a national voting holiday plus compulsory voting.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd rather have universal vote by mail. We already have it in multiple states and it works fine. No need to mess with schedules if people can do it on their own time.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It isn't mutually exclusive. Plus a holiday dedicated to voting means a day is open for researching a candidate, if needed. Also, psychologically, having the purpose of the holiday explicit means that some people will follow the rules of it. There are many prongs to getting people to vote.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem with the voting holiday idea, is many people are forced to work every holiday. They are generally the most marginalized people who work in the service industry as well. I used to be one. I was the general manager of a pizza shop and I worked every single holiday, football game, anything you can think of that will keep people from cooking and/or get them drinking. I also scheduled basically the entire staff for those days. It sucked. I told everyone from the start that holidays don't exist for you anymore in food, but it didn't stop women with tears in their eyes telling me they never expected they wouldn't be able to take their kids trick or treating.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I think the way to resolve this is a holiday window for voting. The workers schedule 4 days of the week for work, then the remaining 3 days are paid holidays. The worker selects which days of that holiday week are best for them. If they don't vote, their company is fined an amount double to the worker's weekly pay.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I prefer vote by mail, too. However, real-life implementation of it only leads to a roughly 10% increase in voter turnout. That only brings us from 55% turnout to 65% turnout, which is pathetic.

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not 4/10.

Most Americans simply did not bother to vote. Trumpers are a minority, it's just that their hatefulness is artificially amplified by Russian bots.