this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
94 points (83.6% liked)

Games

32480 readers
849 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nintendo, one generation behind once again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GregoryTheGreat@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve got a question. Does anyone really care if the specs are x.xxGhz and XGB of RAM? It’ll be +YGhz and YGB of RAM more than the last generation at least.

[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

As long as it can still play the games then no. If it can't handle new generation games then obviously that's an issue. Just like devs game up on games for older Gen consoles.

If you have a switch for Zelda and only Nintendo games then you are probably golden. It's only really an issue for games being ported over. They will require more power for those games. Not graphics but actually to run the beasts.