this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
348 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37716 readers
325 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not sure if this is technically Technology news, but I can remove this post if it's in the wrong community

Archive link: http://archive.today/3XM6s

Musk brought up the idea of charging all users of X/Twitter during a wide-ranging conversation focused on AI that featured Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday. “[We’re] moving to a small monthly payment for use of the X system,” Musk told Netanyahu, claiming that it is the only way to eliminate the problem of bots, as reported by Bloomberg’s Dave Lee.

Musk didn’t mention timing of his plan to charge X/Twitter users, nor did he say how much it would cost.

Musk, who also is CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has said X/Twitter ad sales have plunged 50% since he bought the company. “We’re still negative cash flow, due to ~50% drop in advertising revenue plus heavy debt load,” Musk posted on July 15.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The biggest problem with Bluesky is it's owned by another musk.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's not great, but that's an exaggeration

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago

Until it isn't. The platform is still single-tracked through an unaccountable billionaire.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Not an exaggeration.

[–] ojmcelderry@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There's more than one Musk!? 😱

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, yes.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What would that be, Meesk? Like, "a Daddy-didn't-hug-me of Meesk just got out of that limo over there."

[–] norbert@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Muckersybergzos

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't say the owner is anywhere near musk-like, however it is still centralized. The system seems to be setup to allow fediverse-like federation in the future, but right now the only instance is the official Bluesky instance.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Dorsey more of a proto-Musk IMO. He went off to an island to live with cocaine and guns. He only came back recently to create another social network ~~because he hates Musk’s guts~~. (Edit: I guess I was wrong, and he doesn’t hate Musk)

Don’t get me wrong, I’m pretty sure the guys fucking insane, but I also don’t think he’s as bad as musk or as hell-bent on destroying democracy. He’s just interested in making money to buy more cocaine and islands and guns.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dorsey is a best pal of Musk's

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are you sure? I know they used to be super friends, but I thought they had a falling out.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hmm.. either they made up, or I’m thinking of something else. I’ll take your word for it.

Anyway, the rest of what I said stands. Dorsey may be bonkers (check out that Vice interview from a year or two ago), but he’s not even in the same league of evil bastards as Musk. He may be completely a self-interested billionaire, scumbag, but he’s not a literal fascist with Musk’s track record, nor is he actively stoking neo-nazi activity while personally interfering with an ongoing war in favor of our country’s greatest and longest-standing enemy.

I think you’re giving Jack Dorsey a bit too much credit by calling him another musk.

Edit: Although… he kinda was “Musk before Musk” if you know what I mean. Like I first said: proto-Musk.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Fair enough. Cheers ✌🏻