this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
507 points (99.0% liked)

politics

23101 readers
4225 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where were they for the last 24 years?

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just trying to function under capitalism while providing for their family? Often both immediate and extended since many of our scholars and scientists are immigrants who came here for a higher wage to send money back home to their parents.

And mostly being increasingly annoyed at how almost all media attacks intellectuals and paints us as "out of touch" and "having no common sense". All while acknowledging that the entire world is shifting authoritarian but not expecting the US to speedrun a decade or two of erosion of civil rights.

But hey, good on you for continuing to demonstrate just how ingrained anti-intellectualism is into the cultural zeitgeist. Because this shit has been going on for a lot longer than 24 years. Most people attribute it to reagan. But the end result is that basically everyone grew up on (national equivalents of) nickelodean sitcoms where the protagonist kid proves they are smarter than their teachers because they understood a pun or knew one tidbit of trivia.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok. I'm anti-intellectual for recognizing the post 9-11 authoritarian shift in this country.

Do you have any other astute observations to offer?

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So... you blame that on "scholars"?

Because you seem to think that people weren't talking about exactly that for close to 50 years. You just weren't paying attention. And now are apparently criticizing people for continuing to talk about it.

Again, THAT is what the legacy of reagan et al is. We all grew up on media that makes us immediately want to complain that "Scientists said eggs were good for us then bad for us then good for us" and all the other crap that encourages people to just get angry when they hear "common sense" and actively ignore anything that isn't.

Language matters. And understanding that language is how you understand what biases have been ingrained into you.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

I think their point is that you don’t have to be an “intellectual” or “scholar” to make the observation in the OP title. Which was exactly my take when I read it as well.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

You're reaching hard my guy.

Also yes. Fuck Reagan. Pissing on his grave is on my bucket list.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

Heads buried in the sand praying it'll go away if they don't acknowledge it.