this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
681 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

69211 readers
3326 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 130 points 2 days ago (11 children)

I read that airbnb lead to rents rise, because it made it so easy for landlords to run their property like hotels. I don't use them, and kind of think lowly of people that are like "well it's convenient so i don't care".

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 78 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This. They help destroy housing markets.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

while hotels and motels run at low capacity utilization

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I only use it when I travel in large groups. At which point it's really really nice. It's private. It's quiet. It's cheap (per person). It's more social. We usually also save money on food by buying in bulk and cooking.

[–] kalpol@lemm.ee 52 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Living next to a few short-term rentals, it is so extremely creepy to have various large groups of people in and out, staring at you and your stuff, blocking the street with Ubers and scooters, and you only think it's quiet because you're the house making all the noise.

It sucks to make a neighborhood a nice place to live only to have all that leeched for profit selling to bachelorette parties full of girls going WOOO at 1 AM.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I live in a neighborhood that regularly (as in, at least once, often more times a week) has people blasting concert grade speakers until like 4 in the morning, with revving cars, fireworks, gunshots, etc etc.

and thats from people who live there. no airbnbs.

Shitty people are shitty people. at least with an airbnb you have a chance at a break in the neighbors being dickheads.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

As usual, a few jerks ruin it for the rest of us.

I've stayed at a number of airbnbs and we're very respectful of our neighbors. We basically treat the place as if we lived there, because that's what we're looking for.

Hotels suck:

  • no kitchen, just a microwave if you're lucky
  • expensive for a small space
  • housekeeping - I don't want strangers looking through my stuff
  • target for crime - cars get broken into a lot at hotels and motels
  • annoying check-in process, always seem to need to ask the desk people for something, etc

I just don't like hotels. Maybe zoning could limit airbnbs to townhouse/condo communities or something that are all rentals, but give me more options than a stupid hotel.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe zoning could limit airbnbs to townhouse/condo communities or something that are all rentals

Yeah, let the people that can't afford to buy a house deal with them. The poors are used to living in shitty neighborhoods already, right?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Maybe hotels could just learn something from ABnB and offer some larger, more comfortable spaces with kitchens and 4-5 bedrooms? They're all over in Vegas.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Airbnb kitchens aren't great either (dull knives, wrecked pans) but at least they exist.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're hit and miss, but yes, existing is the critical part here. I can make up for a missing/wrecked pan, I can't conjure an oven.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Roll against your wisdom to not cast lvl 3 conjure gas line

If you fail your wisdom check You'll need dex of 18 to not start a fire.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 2 days ago

I don't doubt it's not great to live next to them.

you only think it's quiet because you're the house making all the noise.

That's awful presumptious of you. Why would I think it was quiet if the noise was coming from inside the house? How does that make any sense to you?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

Shouldn't this, according to the much quoted rule of supply and demand, lead to cheaper prizes in the hotel market?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

further destroy housing markets.

investors are already doing their work, too.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 64 points 2 days ago (2 children)

While Air B&B has done irreperable harm to the housing market, I'm not 100% convinced it should be banned. I propose if a house operates as an enterprise, it be taxed according to commercial rates, not residential. It would go a long way to resolving the inequities.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

this. it should be taxed like any other hotel/motel

At least for the time it's not used as a residence by the owners. If they want a mixed rate, they need to prove when they are there and when they're not (i.e. when it's listed for rent).

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I imagine there are some "written in blood" laws and regulations that apply to hotels that airbnb is ignoring, too. That should also be addressed.

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I read a story about that, it was a VRBO though.

Sauce

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It means there's not enough construction. If apartments were used as hotels, then more construction would offset increase in prices

[–] shark_phenomenon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It was a nice concept in the 2010s when it was like an advanced version of Couchsurfing or a digital version of a homestay. Then of course it became an unsustainable business model and went to dogs when it became a money making scheme for finance bros to buy up housing and charge 4-star hotel prices.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yep instead of lowering rent because your unit is unaffordable you just buy up and rent them all out creating housing scarcity and prices will increase right up until the point ppl can't afford to vacation anymore... Which is pretty much now anyway. Queue up all the BS stories. "Millennials/zoomers don't 'want' to vacation anymore"

The Snake is going to eat it's tail.

[–] freeman@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

I think it shouldnt be on the consumers but on the lawmaker. Tax airbnbs like real bnbs or like hotels or there are many other levers that can be pulled to make it less profitable than renting to locals

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

partially right, but its usually the corporate real estate companies doing this, they buy up the HOUSES and just air bnb, or rent them forever, without even selling any of the houses.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Where I feel like they have a suitable place is for vacation rentals. Like when I was a kid our family would rent a house at the beach for a week as our summer vacation. The beach we’d go to had several real estate companies that would manage the rentals and published little booklets every year with the listings. The houses were privately owned, though, so as Airbnb and especially VRBO came along this gave the homeowners another option that was perhaps less expensive than the agencies. These are houses in a vacation area, though, generally not taking away housing from locals. This also was traditionally a family that owned one extra house for family getaways and trying to rent it out when they weren’t using it, not investors creating “hotel” chains. Setting up what is effectively a hotel in a residential area and cutting off housing from people who need it should be an obvious problem yet many people don’t recognize it.

[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

don’t forget the rudeness of some people. they behave like the whole building is a hotel and they can do whatever they damn well please.

If it were up to me, I would obliterate this concept. Hotels are for holidays, not people’s houses where everyone brings along their holiday brains and are being generally disrespectful towards the communities.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In Paris, France, government officials went around the inner city area and forcefully removed all unofficial key safes from buildings. That’s how all cities should handle this.

However, some years ago there was a news story going around about one person that owns various different places in Berlin, all listed under different names on AirBnB and that person barely visits those places as he has cleaning people do everything in between bookings. They only pocket the huge amounts of money while doing nothing. And the description to find the door key was like “find the public bicycle rack and look for the broken bike with a pink frame, the key will be under the saddle” and there were specific instructions to not talk to anyone in that building. So they definitely knew that this was kind of a grey area…

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

We used one in Manhattan that was somewhat like this about a decade ago. We were told to tell anyone else in the building that we were friends of some guy (can't recall the name) who was different than the one doing the booking.

Hotels suck.

holiday brains

Not sure what this is, every time I use an airbnb I treat the place as if I lived there, because that's why I'm selecting an airbnb instead of a hotel. We often leave the place better than it was when we got there.

Surely there's some way to preserve the benefits of airbnb while cutting down on the abusers.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

yeah I get things like its the only option yet somehow people traveled and found a place to stay before it existed.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Originally, they did fill a niche. If you have a big group of people, a hotel breaks the group up into rooms. Airbnb lets you have one place all to yourself.

Nowadays it's gone to shit with low quality spaces, hotels listing themselves on Airbnb, stuff like that. I hope there's a middle ground.