this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
1104 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

14312 readers
2902 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VivianRixia@piefed.social 88 points 1 week ago (7 children)

So was it just random that their fur is orange and not green? As both would help hunt prey just as well. Or is the advantage of being orange, that it wards away other tigers and predators that might otherwise muscle into its territory and create conflict.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 184 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It’s also orange because mammals can’t produce green pigments, so orange is the next best thing if your prey is red-green colorblind.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 103 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Our primary outer protein is basically keratin, which can be tinted orange(carotene), beige (collagen) or brown/black (melanin).

The green pigment is a byproduct of bilirubin catabolism, which we don't have because we use a different pathway to metabolize and recycle it.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Not particularly, just doesn't have hooves.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the green pigment? What green pigment?

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

For reptiles and other stuff, we don't have those.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

more accurately, orange pigments are readily available. Nothing fundamentally stops mammals (or anything else) from developing a green. Note for example many animals have green eyes.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From what I understand green eyes are a bit weird as far as coloration goes, as they look green due to the way light is interacting with small amounts of melanin in the iris (the same pigment that makes eyes brown) rather than due to green pigment. I’m not sure that could be replicated in fur vs in a liquid environment like with the eye.

Birds mimic green colored pigments with iridescence (except turacos, they have green pigments for real) in their feathers, but I’m not sure that’s something mammals can do structurally in fur the way birds can in feathers.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Both blue and green eyes in humans and blues and many greens in vertebrates are structural, yeah. Yes the structural coloring could be recreated in fur or skin. (noting that many mammals do structural IR effects in their fur, famously polar bears)

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

I wish I could find the sources from when I was reading about this months ago, it was more about evolution in terms of things that can happen and not ‘random’ mutations, and one of the examples was tigers with orange fur instead of green. It’s not physically impossible to have structural coloring (although the fact there are no green mammals suggests a strong inhibition somewhere along the line), but you first have to have the genetic and molecular groundwork laid to allow it to happen. Ex: it’s not physically impossible for animals to manufacture their own vitamin C, but humans just can’t do it because we don’t have the necessary molecular pathways other animals use. I hope that makes sense for what I’m trying to get at.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

... So how do green eyes work?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Awesome thanks!

Neat to learn mammals are normally green due to genetic structures.

So green hair and fur could never happen naturally.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The color of your eyes doesn't have anything to do with the cones and rods that pick up the light reflected off of objects.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I mean the pigment of the iris.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This is probably an example of natural evolution/selection where tigers that had slowly evolved more orange in their fur naturally, were able to feed more. This in turn meant the orange triat in their genes was passed on more frequently and became more dominant in the population.

In a sense it was probably a "random" mutation, but when it became useful and effective it was passed down quicker.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is how evolution works. People often imagine some sort of logical system to it, but it really is just random mutations all over, with the advantageous ones propagating. There were probably a bunch of tigers with various odd colors or patterns at some point due to random mutations, but those evidently were less useful for hunting and reproducing than how they look now, so they died out in competition with the known variants.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Ya so we wouldn’t expect everything to be optimized or all “features” (traits) to be useful right?

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

But deer vision is immutable god creation. Checkmate.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

Maybe the orange color happened to coincide with the patterns that worked best. Had their prey been able to see the orange tint it would have worked against the tiger, but since they can't it was allowed to flourish with that pattern. If true at all, it's a bit of a dead end since a mutation for the prey to begin seeing orange means tigers have narrowed into that pattern dependent on the color.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Are there any green animals that aren't reptiles, birds or insects? That might be a clue.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sloths can be green if I recall correctly, they have a special clear type of hair that can grow moss or algea on, or in it or something

[–] Reyali@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

They can appear green because of the plant growth, but don’t produce the green color themselves.

[–] EpicMuch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Could probably come up with a few fishes, but no mammals come to mind

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Probably both, except within the bounds of easily 'random' bounds. Supposing it were possible for a mammal to be green, it wouldn't matter of green were 'better', unless it happened at the right time. Orange could have won out simply because it was good enough to do one thing (camoflauge for pretty) and didn't have enough downside to message that benefit (high visibility to hunters or less valuable prey). Heck, a gene that turned a lion invisible could have turned up and it wouldn't be guaranteed to carry forward even if it didn't have any downsides if the random recipient also happened to be clumsy or unlucky and died of some random injury or disease.

Evolution doesn't really have any tools that aren't random, at least until intelligence came around to provide other 'non natural' paths, though of course those are just as natural as the others, just that we think we're special and above nature.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Yellows and browns and orange are a lot more related, and whatever color the pre-orange tiger ancestor was, it was almost certainly one of those.

Natural variation in the coat means some of those tigers were more orange than their peers. This trait was selected for.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Recall that evolution isn't intelligent. Random mutations do random shit until one is accidentally successful. Random orange that appears green falls right into that scheme 😅

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

It feels like we were denied the stunning possibility of green tigers... until you stop and remember the stunning reality of them being bright fucking orange.