this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
73 points (88.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

39784 readers
1563 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Not only that, I’ve tried pitching the fediverse to right wing people, but they didn’t bite.

Even the crypto bros that were all about decentralization couldn’t see why a decentralized social media platform was superior.

This also didn’t matter for people who care about “free speech”.

You think the allure of being fully independent and having your own instance would be right up their alley given how they value independence, but nope.

Seriously? Why isn’t there a right wing instance? My guess is that a right wing person can’t fathom owning something that benefits others which doesn’t give them back profit.

[–] Letme@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

"free speech", as your quotation marks imply, does not really exist outside of theory. In reality, free speech is a set of laws governing hate speech or other dangerous speech.

Both the right and the left have ideas of what they think these laws should be.

But there is no such thing as "free speech" in the real world.

[–] tocano@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago
[–] libra00@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Like everything on the right, decentralization is a means to an end, not a value in itself. They only care about it when it's useful for helping them get ahead. Just like they only care about free speech when it's them speaking to people who don't want to hear their bullshit.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

You think the allure of being fully independent and having your own instance would be right up their alley given how they value independence, but nope.

Because it's not about freedom of speech for them, it's about freedom to force people to listen. Having their own server where they can shout at each other all day doesn't serve their purpose. Their panties get wet by forcing others to listen.

Trump's tremendous social media platform truth dot barf runs on Activity Pub, they just don't federate with anyone by default. It's like they don't want dissenting views on there. Weird.

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

i think there were one or two right wing instances, but they got defederated from everyone

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 7 hours ago

Which were they? As in what was their domain name?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do they still exist? I’m honestly curious if they are active or if it’s abandoned

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The only one I know of shut down and the admin posted this message:

I knew Lemmy had its challenges, but I hoped it would evolve for the better. Sadly after 2 years, the culture of censorship through defederation has only grown stronger.

So they shutdown because they couldn't federate with any other instances and considered that censorship. A few people in that thread linked to another instance I've never heard of as an alternative and that one 404s if you type in the address so I guess they're all still on reddit and twitter.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So they shutdown because they couldn't federate with any other instances and considered that censorship

Damn, I actually didn’t see that coming, I guess they will move the goal post from any starting point.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm going to play devil's advocate and ask: How is it not censorship?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Cause no one is stopping you from going to said instance and just having the discussion there.

If there was this super important leak that needed to be out there, if it’s posted on a right wing instance that is a defederated ghost town, it’s still out there. People can link to it and leverage the instance to have the needed discussions.

Censorship means removing access, defederation does not wipe it off of the Internet.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I would argue that censorship includes the suppression of information in its definition, not only it's removal.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The information isn't being suppressed, just not allowed to seep our of the trash bin it's currently in

If you want the garbage it's easy to find. Most normal people don't, so it gets kept where it won't taint everything

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Same logic applied to something the right does:

"We are not banning books, we are just not allowing them in libraries and schools. You can always buy them if you feel the need to expose your child to them."

So, following your logic, the right isn't suppressing information about LGBtQI+ people.

Dont get me wrong please, I don't think right wing content should stand unchallenged. I am just not a big fan of only allowing the "correct" information. Because, that is what the right is doing already (while screaming about free speach, mind you). I think it's better to engage with right content and destroy it with arguments, rather then just banning it. I know I'm a minority with that opinion on Lemmy. I'm fine with that.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because "crypto bros" care about making money, not any ideology, except in a performative sense. If you pitched the fediverse to the original researchers inventing cryptocurrency and the early adopters, they would likely be receptive. But these are no longer associated with the current crypto crowd.

They don't care about making money, they care about gambling and having a gambling addiction and trying to justify it

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 day ago

Why isn’t there a right wing instance?

Because all other instances would assume that it’s for Nazis and defederate.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

there are 3 major right-wing instances: lemmy.ml(ran by the Lemmy developers), lemmygrad.ml(the openly fascist version of lemmy.ml) and hexbear.net.

if anyone wants to argue, I don't. Anyone supporting Russia is right-wing. Authoritarianism is inherently conservative, reactionary and therefore right-wing.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 13 hours ago

Authoritarianism is inherently conservative

Sorry, but no

There's a reason the step up from just left/right axis is the up/down of libertarian v authoritarian. Auth-left is very much a thing and is what tankies are