this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
80 points (87.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

39784 readers
1406 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do they still exist? I’m honestly curious if they are active or if it’s abandoned

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The only one I know of shut down and the admin posted this message:

I knew Lemmy had its challenges, but I hoped it would evolve for the better. Sadly after 2 years, the culture of censorship through defederation has only grown stronger.

So they shutdown because they couldn't federate with any other instances and considered that censorship. A few people in that thread linked to another instance I've never heard of as an alternative and that one 404s if you type in the address so I guess they're all still on reddit and twitter.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So they shutdown because they couldn't federate with any other instances and considered that censorship

Damn, I actually didn’t see that coming, I guess they will move the goal post from any starting point.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm going to play devil's advocate and ask: How is it not censorship?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cause no one is stopping you from going to said instance and just having the discussion there.

If there was this super important leak that needed to be out there, if it’s posted on a right wing instance that is a defederated ghost town, it’s still out there. People can link to it and leverage the instance to have the needed discussions.

Censorship means removing access, defederation does not wipe it off of the Internet.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz -3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I would argue that censorship includes the suppression of information in its definition, not only it's removal.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The information isn't being suppressed, just not allowed to seep our of the trash bin it's currently in

If you want the garbage it's easy to find. Most normal people don't, so it gets kept where it won't taint everything

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz -2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Same logic applied to something the right does:

"We are not banning books, we are just not allowing them in libraries and schools. You can always buy them if you feel the need to expose your child to them."

So, following your logic, the right isn't suppressing information about LGBtQI+ people.

Dont get me wrong please, I don't think right wing content should stand unchallenged. I am just not a big fan of only allowing the "correct" information. Because, that is what the right is doing already (while screaming about free speach, mind you). I think it's better to engage with right content and destroy it with arguments, rather then just banning it. I know I'm a minority with that opinion on Lemmy. I'm fine with that.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 43 minutes ago

No, it's not at all the same situation or logic

It's more like building a second library for those books and putting it in an undesirable part of town. Still findable, just a bit harder and made less.likely for your average person to find

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

The issue with this is signal-to-noise ratio. If everything is equally valuable speech, then it becomes a bad platform for discussion.

The solution is for the individuals that want to share their right wing views to do so from an instance that are not consided problematic. I live in Norway, we are considered one of the most democratic countries in the world, and we do not allow hate speech.

A lot of the speech from right wing Americans would easily be considered unlawful here. With good reason.

There is nothing stopping someone with right wing views from registering and sharing their opinions on most Lemmy instances. Except if they want to act as bigots. They are free to talk about pretty much any traditional right wing topic. They can talk about immigration, how the money will trickle down anytime now, and most topics.

Right wing people are welcome at Lemmy. They are just not allowed to spread hate and be explicit bigots. The ones who leave or don't join are not censored, they are just whiny and complain when people are sick of their shit.