this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
327 points (84.3% liked)

Political Memes

7669 readers
3978 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's just good praxis when you divide the electorate and usher in a fascist regime that will kill millions, but 'divisive' when you criticize that?

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Too bad you didn’t participate when a vote was all that was needed. It’s going to take a lot more than that now.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Voting isn't enough!" mfers doing nothing that substantiates change now that fascism is literally in the driver's seat.

Thanks. Me and everyone else who's going to fucking die under this administration thank you for your immeasurable left purity.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So exactly what amount of criticism will overthrow a fascist regime? I can say with certainty that more votes would have prevented one from taking over.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Considering that the core message of "The LIBS are too IMPURE to be worth allying with, even to stop fascism!", it may be that this attitude has wider implications than just in the last election. Maybe cultivating fascist-enabling attitudes has fascist-enabling consequences?

No, of course not. How silly of me. It's just the one time, the 2024 election, wherein fascist-enabling attitudes had fascist-enabling consequences. Next time it'll be fine.

The attitude criticized here is the same attitude that would've decried the Sovs and Western Allies teaming up to fight the literal fucking Nazis.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Who said it was just the one time? Welcome to FPTP elections. We get two choices, neither is ideal. You vote for the lesser of two evils, or you accept the greater to lead the nation. It’s a horrible system, but you’re smart enough to know how it works.

The attitude here is quite literally the opposite. Your arrogance is deporting innocent people to El Salvador. Your pride is taking food and medicine from the needy. Your self-righteousness is building a billionaire resort in Gaza.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

... are we talking past each other? Because right now, it sounds like you're making the same point I am.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My bad. I just reread the thread and it seems you’re right. I really should get some coffee before I start typing. Lol

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No worries! As long as we're on the same wavelength now!

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We usually are. I was a little confused to see you defending protest voting when we’re up against fascism given your prior comments. That should’ve been my first clue to wake up some more before responding. Lol

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the core might be that we read the meme itself differently - I read it as sarcastic.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I did too at first, but then I saw who posted it.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The attitude criticized here is the same attitude that would've decried the Sovs and Western Allies teaming up to fight the literal fucking Nazis

Isn't this a little on the nose?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Red fascist apologia, how surprising. But who cares about Polish or Baltic sovereignty? You have ~~imperialism~~ 'power politics' to play defense for, right?

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

who cares about Polish or Baltic sovereignty?

Certainly not the French of British

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Certainly not the French of British

The point of dispute was the Soviet Union asserting that the treaty would have given the Sovs permission to invade Poland and the Baltics, while the position of the UK and France was that Poland and the Baltics were sovereign and that France and the UK had no power to grant the Soviets any such thing.

I'm curious - historical illiteracy, or intentional bootlicking?