this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
327 points (84.3% liked)

Political Memes

7669 readers
2789 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Obviously the solution is for more people to vote third party

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then maybe a 3rd party should get off their fucking asses and start getting some representatives elected locally, so that they can eventually have EVEN ONE representative in Congress, so that maybe some day voting 3rd party for president isn't the dumbest fucking thing imaginable.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People that vote third party, don't down ballot vote or vote in mid-terms. They don't even vote in primaries. Example: Bernie.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Yup.

They show up to presidential elections and whine and cry and flaunt their supposed moral superiority, but don't even bother showing up for midterms or primaries. Shit makes me sick.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not without an elimination of FPTP ya don't.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Actually, having a progressive party and a conservative party would be far better than having a conservative party and fascist party.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago

Correct, but there are obstacles to getting there, including FPTP.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Lol and you and I voting third party leads to that outcome how exactly?

Of all the terrible things happening, I think it’s people’s hopelessly terrible understanding of politics that makes me the most depressed right now.

Edit: I don’t like how negative this comment is so I want to add some possible solutions. Change requires collective action. Individual votes are insignificant to the point of meaninglessness.

There are three main strategies I can see to create a force for progressive or leftist change.

  1. Change the political system so that third parties become viable. This is tough because the duopoly doesn’t want it, and without a party where is your base of power? So I don’t think it’s particularly viable on its own—but there are orgs that push for this, and they have the advantage of being nonpartisan and can appeal to many people of many political persuasions. So if you want to make this your priority, tap into some of those organizations. But this also means ignoring pressing crises of today in the hope that reforming the electoral system will allow us to address them in the future. But of this there is no guarantee—it’s just as likely a fascist party will gain from your efforts as a leftist one.
  2. Achieve a takeover from the inside of the Democratic Party. This is basically how the republicans went from conservatives to fascists. It might be the easiest of the three—but that doesn’t mean it will be easy. It means people need to set aside their distaste for democrats and the system and put a lot of effort into attending local meetings, voting for delegates, etc. It also has the drawback that the system itself has a tendency to corrupt reformers and bring them in line with its logic.
  3. Create political power outside of a direct political party. Personally I think this might be the best approach if your goals are to radically transform society. There are many directions one could take, organizing with DSA or another org that makes endorsements, union organizing, mutual aid, etc. Basically you want to organize a mass of people who can sway society by acting in unison to either impose costs or benefits on those you wish to influence—or to directly enact or disrupt programs yourselves. The downside is that this is very very difficult and it may take years of going nowhere to organize enough people to really have an influence. But because the other two operate within existing systems of power, it has the greatest potential to bring about large transformations in society. But only if you put in the work and enough people join you.
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That wall of idealism is great if you could get it into the minds and hearts of the majority of voters. I tried myself, back in the late 90s. Seeing Bush win after I stumped for Nader was a sobering wake up call. Can you imagine the guilt I felt protesting Bush’s blood for oil wars knowing that I actively disengaged people from voting for Gore?

FPTP is in control. We are not. We get two choices. Anything else is equivalent to abstention.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Big changes requires idealism. Will it happen? I don’t know, but I’m just saying these are the strategies that I can see being at least possible.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you know what’s far more possible? Engaging more than 20% attendance in congressional primary elections to replace the centrist Democrats with progressives.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

That’s literally one of the strategies I mentioned.

If enough people vote third party than they are voting for a major party again.