this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
412 points (99.3% liked)

politics

22454 readers
3424 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptu@lemm.ee -4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah I don’t get it either. Every election I voted in I’ve had to have id. It’s been like this for a long time and it hasn’t shifted so that we need proof of ethnicity or some other bs people here are suggesting will happen next.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are people really not aware of the issues with voter ID laws? Do we really need to go over this basic shit again?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

What are these issues? Every other country in the world ids voters.

I'm not Trump fan by any means but it's hard to argue against voter ID. Americans in general seem to live in 3rd world when it comes to IDs with your social security number shit etc.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We had a whole civil rights movement about it. Jim Crow. MLK Jr. The laws are specifically intended to apply selective enforcement. That is their entire purpose. Why do you think these laws are always proposed by Republicans?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry but not implementing ID cards is literally the dumbest way to address this 🙄

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And y'all say Americans are dumb. Clearly stupidity is universal.

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

@drmoose @prole The UK only just brought it in a few years ago, against the advice of the Elec Commission as we don't really have any fraud and we don't have universal ID cards so it's complicated to know what you'd need to bring. Mostly it's passports or driving licences which relies on people having the cash to drive or travel, and their name matching the voter roll. If someone is turned away for not having ID they might not come back.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Maybe its time to join the 21st century and issue citizen ids?

No wonder identity theft and scams are so rampant in the US.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We have citizen IDs. If you really don't understand the issue. Open a history book. I'll even give you a starting point. Read about Jim Crow laws.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago

Nah that's not a justification. Just fix your country instead of running away from your problems. Seriously americans are spineless as fuck.

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

@drmoose it was discussed in the 00s (in the UK!) but was massively polarising and got dropped. People didn't like the idea of having to carry something that proved who they are.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

That's just crazy to me. How can society function when people are afraid to identify themselves to officials they should be trusting and relying on.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sometimes those officials deny you rights, including your right to live.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It seems like ID is not the issue here then?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

ID is one tool by which they selectively allow or suppress voting. ID laws are not the root cause, but it's ridiculous to suggest giving the fascists another tool to use.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So maybe fascism is your issue not the ID laws? How come its not an issue in other developed countries.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because those countries are not run by goddamn nazis, are you intentionally not listening to anything I say?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So nazis are your problem not the IDs right?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's like saying "so the mugger is your problem, not the gun, right?"

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You can't just say "whoosh" whenever you're losing an argument.

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 2 points 3 days ago

@drmoose dunno, we have a strong tradition of petty bureaucratic jobsworths who take rule-following too far, and also a nasty history of over-policing protests.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

In person voter fraud is so statistically inconsequential that it might as well not exist. The idea that this is meant to prevent voter fraud is preposterous. It's just pretense.

All this does is create more hurdles for people who already have difficulty voting from decades of disenfranchisement. It's the goal of these laws, and Republican politicians have literally admitted it.

How do you get an ID if you don't have an address? They can't win with policy, and high voter turnout always means the results skew left, so they focus on stopping people of certain demographics from voting altogether.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not about voting fraud but your entire culture being so crippled by fear that you avoid basic societal structures that are accepted as a net positive literally everywhere else. Maybe it's time to stand up for yourself?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah you're right, I should have realized and done something about that sooner. Thank God you were here to tell me.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

It really depends on what the purpose of voter ID is.

If it's to ensure that everyone that is entitled to vote votes once and only once, you'll see some key properties. It'll be free and easy to get. Applying for it is as simple as applying to vote (which itself will be easy to do), and it'll be virtually automatic that you get it. In many cases, it'll arrive unannounced as the Government already knows everything it needs to get you this card, and you won't have to do anything but show up at the polls election day with the card they gave you.

If it's to ensure that only 'desirable' voters can vote, it'll have other key properties. Getting it will be as easy as the above if you're the preferred class. But if you're the undesirable class of voter, getting it will have more hassles than its worth. It'll cost money. It'll have onerous requirements. It'll take you lots of time, and require transportation. It'll be designed to discourage you from voting. Because that's the goal. Onerous enough that you give up and let your betters rule you like God intended.

Can you guess what the United States' goal with voter ID is? Here's a hint. We have a long history of treating certain groups of people like crap, and despite 1865's end of the Civil War, there are STILL people who would rather see Black people in chains and treated like animals.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Every election I voted in I’ve had to have id.

I'm currently trying to get my newborn son a passport, as the offices that handle this - SSA, Post Office, etc - are rapidly being dismantled by DOGE. I have no idea how we'll be able to maintain or renew our documentation in coming years, given that there's simply not going to be anyone to stamp the forms and mail me renewed papers at this rate.

it hasn’t shifted so that we need proof of ethnicity or some other bs

It specifically has for transgender people. We've seen both state and national rules changes that no longer recognize change of gender identity on forms. So a person who shows up to vote with a form that shows "Man" when presenting as a Woman is prime target for disenfranchisement.

We're also increasingly seeing Hispanic and Arab people targeted for arrest and imprisonment, purely on an individual not currently carrying ID (and - in many cases - despite this fact). It isn't hard to imagine this persecution continuing into the next election cycle, with DHS agents grabbing people at polling stations.

[–] ptu@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Thank you for your insight. I hadn’t realized how obtaining an id could be an issue. We just use our driver’s licence (issued by the police) which most of us have already at hand. Wish you and the family all the best.