this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
412 points (99.3% liked)

politics

22517 readers
3624 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 122 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Trump is doing this to distract media attention from the biggest fuck-up of his administration so far, and there's been a lot.

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 14 points 4 days ago

Well, destroying democracy is pretty distracting, so kudos, I guess.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 45 points 5 days ago (3 children)

the biggest fuck-up of his administration so far

The biggest fuck-up of his administration this week.
His administration is a scandal factory.
They will fuck up and make a mess, and their solution is to make a bigger mess to distract from the one they just made.
What about the bigger mess? Well I guess they'll just have to make an even bigger mess to cover that one up.
Rinse and repeat.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but Kamala brought Liz Cheney on stage, so...

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Perhaps using Richard Cheney's daughter to rebut the guy running for Unitary Executive was a mistake.

No, no, no. It was definitely just voters being stupid. I guess democracy was a mistake and we should have simply consolidated power under a more liberal dictatorship sooner.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, because I must think it was a good idea simply because I'm not stupid enough to use it as a reason to not vote for her. Another straw man from another "leftist" completely unwilling to accept reality.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

Another straw man

Harris lost. She performed worse than the two other democrats who ran against Trump. That's not a strawman, its a simple fact.

Perhaps you think it is a strawman to suggest she might have been responsible for her exceptionally poor performance?

Thus solving the problem once and for all!

[–] Zahtu@feddit.org 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

So, what do you think, the biggest mess will be end of the Line? I for myself am betting on declaring war onto another Country. Or nuclear missiles. Whatever, we are fucked 🤷‍♂️

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

According to project 2025, the end of the line is martial law then full authoritarian dictatorship.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

At this point I'm not sure that there is an end of the line.
This has been the case since he took office in 2017, we're 8 years in now and every week he outdoes himself.
He kept creating scandal after scandal for 4 years when he wasn't in office, and still got reelected.
This isn't stopping until he's room temperature. Hopefully the fact that he refuses to exercise, has an excess of presenting dementia symptoms, Eats McDonald's for every meal, and has a stimulant addiction, catches up to him sooner rather than later.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

He's powered by feces, hate and bitterness, he's going to live to be 120 just to spite everyone with a conscience on this planet.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That we know. That likely wasn't the only signal chat group these idiots were using , and they probably still are.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

of course not. if it were, there would be at least one person going "why are we using signal for this?" or at least "is this ok that we're doing this over signal?"

they're the most incompetent bunch of losers you could possibly bring together. I don't think you could manage this is you put an ad on Craigslist for incompetent losers, or have a fucking dimwit convention.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

The title of the chat implies to me that it's just one of many "small groups"

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Other way around. He's taking advantage of the distraction to make an order that - without hyperbole - could literally end democracy in the US.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Yes perhaps we should first require military communications required everyone involved be identified and verified, hmm?

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Oh. Ok. I'll sit down then. Not like he'd actually do anything this time.

Right?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

It seems like the biggest military intelligence fuck up in recent memory. Not just his administration.