this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1688 readers
206 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
50
Credulous coverage of AI slop on Wikipedia (awful.systems)
submitted 2 days ago by blakestacey@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Everybody loves Wikipedia, the surprisingly serious encyclopedia and the last gasp of Old Internet idealism!

(90 seconds later)

We regret to inform you that people write credulous shit about "AI" on Wikipedia as if that is morally OK.

Both of these are somewhat less bad than they were when I first noticed them, but they're still pretty bad. I am puzzled at how the latter even exists. I had thought that there were rules against just making a whole page about a neologism, but either I'm wrong about that or the "rules" aren't enforced very strongly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nightsky@awful.systems 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I also really don't enjoy AI boom.

GPT-3 is a large language model that was released in 2020 by OpenAI and is capable of generating high-quality human-like text. [...] An upgraded version called GPT-3.5 was used in ChatGPT, which later garnered attention for its detailed responses and articulate answers across many domains of knowledge.

Who wrote this? OpenAI marketing?

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Let's see, it cites Scott Computers, a random "AI Safety Fundamentals" website, McKinsey (four times!), a random arXiv post....