this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
63 points (83.2% liked)

Asklemmy

45983 readers
1372 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Came across a list of pseudosciences and was fun seeing where im woo woo.

Lunar effect – the belief that the full Moon influences human and animal behavior.

Ley Lines

Accupressure/puncture

Ayurveda

Body Memory

Faith healing

Anyway, list too long to read. I guess Im quite the nonscientific woowoomancer. How about you? What pseudoscience do you believe? Also I believe nearly every stone i find was an ancient indian stone. Also manifesting and or prayer to manipulate via subconscious aligning the future. oh and the ability to subconsciously deeply understand animals, know the future, etc

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 25 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Cryptozoology. There are definitely creatures unknown to science. Dozens of new ones are discovered every day. Loch Ness monster - no. Unknown ape - possibly.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I still like the thought that the Loch Ness monster was real, but died out. That legends grew from the real thing, and occasional real sightings, then popularized with more recent faked evidence.

Of course that doesn't mean it probably was real, just it might have been.

[–] Jentu@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

I just know we'll find that damned Insulindian Phasmid soon

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Speaking of unknown animals. Unicorns could pretty much be real. Just imagine: We have horses, we have horned animals (even one-horned animals), it is not impossible that a horse-like animal with a horn exists.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

And it's called a rhino! I do admit that I use the term horse-like rather broadly here.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

They are part of the same order (broad toed ungulates) and share a common ancestor, so they are certainly related

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

It’s an armored unicorn then!

[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

We even have sea unicorns, land unicorns don’t seem too far fetched.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Except all of their remains have somehow disappeared

Hunted and had their horns removed by greedy humans.

[–] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are a fair few accounts in Tasmania about thylacines still existing. The lands are so rugged and harsh that there's not really any solid way to get in there and search. But I'll believe it, absolutely.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is not really cryptozoology, a known real creature that we think is extinct, but if it's turns out to not be... Nothing weird here.

A lot different to claiming there is a loch Ness monster.

[–] stray@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago

Many people claim the Loch Ness monster is an animal thought to be extinct though. The thylacine is generally held to be a cryptid in my experience.