this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
525 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
3533 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nahostdeutschland@feddit.org 212 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Let's be honest: Everything that might be "worse" or "annoying" in Firefox for someone is not relevant in comparison to "no working adblocker available". A browser without adblock is unusable

[–] miridius@lemmy.world -1 points 52 minutes ago (2 children)

What a silly comment. Chrome has plenty of good ad blockers still.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 36 minutes ago

"Is this water warming up, or is it just me? Nah, there's a cool spot over here, this is fine."

-Chrome users

[–] nahostdeutschland@feddit.org 3 points 38 minutes ago

Yeah, because Manifest v3 is just being rolled out as described in the article.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

I haven't actually found anything that doesn't work on Firefox on my personal computer. At work we also use Firefox, and some things don't work on it, but some things don't work on chrome or edge either, it's a hodge poge.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (4 children)

True, but if an adblocker no longer works on a specific browser, change your browser! I started using Netscape back in '94, and lost count on how many browsers I've tested and used in the past... Holy shit, 30+ years!!

[–] imvii@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

Mosaic was awesome. Netscape 1 was pretty cool, but Netscape 2 and animated gifs... zowie! That was a day to remember.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 29 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

30+ years!

.....fuck off, '94 wasn't 30.... counts on fingers several times

.....Shit.....

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I know... Jurassic Park is 33 years this year. It would be like watching a movie from the 60' when it was released.

We're old, friend.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 hours ago

I've never hated my life more than right now...

[–] Teal@lemm.ee 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn’t sound right but it is. I think in ‘94 I was using Juno for email and internet. Shortly after that it was time to actually use one of the many AOL trial discs for service instead of a mini frisbee/ninja star.

Modem sounds, chat rooms, you’ve got mail. What a time to live!

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

Fuck. I got free internet for almost 5 years. So many AOL discs. 01, 02? Friend's dad had a T1 connection put into their house for his work. The difference between T1 and the 56k I had at home? At home walk out the room, have a smoke, maybe ⅔ a boob loaded. At buddy's house, that's when I realised that the internet had the potential to change everything. Whole boob before you could even stand up.

Kids these days. No appreciation for how much struggle it used to be. Everything just. Just there. No bork the only computer in the house because boob.exe.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 28 points 1 day ago (7 children)

In the past 10 years it's pretty much just been Firefox, Safari, Explorer/Edge, and Chrome. 99% of browsers are just skinned Chrome. Even Edge now. Opera's engine died in 2013.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

99% if browsers are just skinned Chrome.

Yup. Hence, the reason I originally suggested to use Firefox, only because it's not built on Chromium.

[–] AJ1@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Hence, the reason I originally suggested to use Firefox

Just FYI, the word "hence" literally means "for this reason". So you just said "for this reason the reason" lol.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Chill dude, I’m just going to the ATM machine to put in my PIN number to take out some money. 🤙

[–] kat@orbi.camp 1 points 16 hours ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I use Palemoon for the nostalgia but also because of the best theme around, Moonscape

Netscape will forever be my number one.

[–] CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago (16 children)

What issues do people even have with firefox? Its a browser, it seems fast enough. Isn't that all most people need from a browser

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I very much dislike Mozilla's direction over the last decade. They're introducing user-hostile features that subtly break normal browsing experience, even when disabled[0]. Not like Google is better, but I'm also trying to get away from Mozilla.

[0] On Firefox Mobile, there's a "feature" which makes the address bar auto-complete domains of companies paying Mozilla. I noticed this with Netflix - I never visit, but when I start writing a URL with n, roughly every 10th time Netflix was suggested. You can disable this feature, but this doesn't actually disable it. The address bar no longer auto-completes with Netflix, instead it just doesn't autocomplete! So 9/10 times I can write n and press Enter, but 1/10 times I press n and search for the letter n.

Mozilla doesn't care whether they break features, as long as they can make more money. I strongly dislike this approach by the supposedly "good" browser manufacturer.

[–] CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee 10 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

Do you have a good non chromium based alternative? To be clear I genuinely am asking those things make switching probably worth it considering how little of a hassle it is.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] thanksforallthefish 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Download fennec it's the fork of ff mobile with less of the cruft.

I don't know if it has fixed that specific problem, but I can't recall seeing it

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Thanks for the recommendation, I'll give it a try!

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

No horizontal tab grouping. Tab groups on Chrome are perfect, and the Firefox tab extensions all suck in comparison.

That said, I'm still using Firefox today because the internet is unusable without a good ad blocker.

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 1 points 13 hours ago

I still use the full screen tab groups feature that they removed from the core. I don't like scrolling tabs, so I can just hit a button and click on the exact tab I want. I do probably have too many tabs open tbh.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 17 hours ago

Tab groups and vertical tabs are at least on Nightly now; you can enable them in settings.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 10 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Too many people complain about the UI and claim it's "outdated, ugly, unusable". I find that funny because you can make FF look almost like anything you want, and I personally hate chrome's UI.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Well, you USED to be able to, anyways, but they've slowly moved to a less customisable ui. Now you have to use extensions from outside websites to even do simple stuff like have a multi-row tab bar.

Not to mention Firefox seems to break them every year or so.

[–] Bruncvik@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm one of those complaining about the UI. Used the TabMixPlus extension to adjust the UI to my liking. FF killed it. So, I started customizing the UI CSS. Every few versions, Mozilla changed the browser enough to invalidate my changes. After a while, I got tired of thiz and switched to Vivaldi, which is Chromium based.

[–] CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago

Honestly I'm probably heading to Vivaldi after reading a lot of these things.

[–] kat@orbi.camp 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Security and sandboxing are important, weak points on the android implementation.

[–] CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

would Vivaldi on android be better? I really like having extensions on my browser and that's the only other android one I know of that has them.

Edit: I was wrong apparently Vivaldi does not support extensions on mobile which is a bummer.

[–] krimson@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have no idea either. Sure, chrome is a little faster but its a minor difference in my opinion. Been using it for a long time and have no idea why it's so unpopular.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 14 points 22 hours ago

Also, keep in mind, google has been caught slowing Firefox down in YouTube before. So if you notice any slowness in their services, it's fair to suspect it might not be Firefox's fault.

[–] CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Was ~~Is~~ a little faster.

No way it stays that way after blocking ad-blocking. Some websites genuinely take over 30s without ad block.

load more comments (11 replies)