politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Crazy how fast they move now...
It took years for them to decide if Biden had the power to do, well, anything as president.
Almost like them slow walking the entire Dem platform was intentional, and a major reason Dems lost 2024 as a result
Biden was trying to with within the legal system. Trump don't care.
Well he certainly had the authority to direct the national archivist to ratify the ERA. And if they refused, he had the authority to replace them. There are dozens of such examples. There is a yawning gulf between the lawlessness of Trump and the utter impotence of Biden.
Hey now, he issued those pardons for his friends and family like a genuine dictator there towards the end. He was figuring out how to wield his powers effectively but they were only really put to use for personal gain. Funny how that works
If the next president threatened to go after my family because they are my family, I'm pardoning them.
To be fair, every President has done this. Every president issues last-second pardons to friends, family, cronies, whoever when they're literally on their way out the door, when they no longer have to worry about the political blowback of such actions.
And in Biden's defense, a lot of the people he pardoned were people who either were already known to be or expected to be on Trump's hit list, and he was taking pre-emptive action to ensure they wouldn't be jailed on (no pun intended) trumped up charges. Garland's DOJ already spent an inordinate amount of time and resources on what amounted to a political persecution of Biden's son on relatively minor and inconsequential charges in order to give a supposed appearance of impartiality. What do you think would happen to these people under the Trump administration once he started the Trump Revenge Tour if he hadn't?
(And I'm not excusing Hunter Biden's actions. But let's be realistic. We all know the reason he was charged in the first place. The DOJ isn't going to waste that much time and resources over a weapons possession charge by a cocaine addict that literally happened a decade or so prior. That was a political hit from start to finish by a man who thanked Biden for the AG position by slow-walking Trump investigations while simultaneously finding something to charge his own son with in order to appear "independent".)
This actually tells me that Biden, to the very last, still didn't understand that Trump doesn't believe in the system. If Trump wants to prosecute Hunter Biden, does anyone really think that these pardons will stop him? In a non-bizarro world, sure, maybe, but those pardons are going to mean about as much as we Kleenex to Trump's DOJ. ALSO, Biden didn't understand that Trump is really not interested in going after rich people as long as they stay out of his way. Trump got elected and basically instantly forgot about Hillary, never even bothered trying to prosecute her. I think we'll probably never hear anything else about the Bidens except for rants on social media.