News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
So she has no legal authority because she dismissed the case, which returned direction to the 11th circuit.
Can anyone with legal education explain to me why we're even giving deference to someone who has no authority over the case?
It seems like letting this fly is just giving them more ammunition to lie and twist the system with impunity to where the rules simply don't matter.
Because we don't have a functioning justice system? Oligarchs run our country, corruption is the currency of power, and the public at large has been duped into thinking we are free.
Yeah that's not a legal opinion as to why this is being allowed. I understand that much already and I'm looking for actual details here. I know folks think such things don't matter so much anymore, but I do.
But it is the correct answer. There's no reason for her to be given any deference on this. The 11th district court has the ability to overrule this judgement at literally any time, and I hope they will. The only reason this works is because rule of law in the U.S. is collapsing.
You will find no satisfactory answers. The oligarchy has abandoned the pretense of the rule of law. It's a scary time to be alive.
I know it won't be satisfactory, but I'm still looking for someone who understands how these legal mechanisms are supposed to work to talk me through it. I simply don't have the legal education to be making a more informed statement, and clearly neither does anyone else here.
While it's easy to shout "Oligarchy!" the details still fucking matter.
There literally isn't a reason.
Ok and I personally think that attitude is gonna help Republicans memory hole how things actually worked in the past by throwing up your hands and giving up instead of trying to find out details.
But you do you man, I'm still gonna at least try to find out things, even if the only thing it helps is having one more person remember how systems were supposed to function and continues talking about it to others.
I hear you, and I understand where you're coming from. But there literally isn't a legal argument for any of it. The SCOTUS has been corrupted and has invalidated their own credibility, and corrupt judges and politicians have been handing down legally indefensible rulings for years. Their justification is "fuck you. What are you gonna do about it?"
Legal systems must be consistent to be valid. Selective application of legal reasoning has exposed our courts to malfeasance. It is rotten at the core, and any justice handed down is unintended coincidence.
The reason is that many people are not doing their jobs. Cut and dry end of story.
I both understand and empathize with your search for meaning here, but that is the meaning.
I understand and empathize with the perspectives in reply to this as well, I just think its defeatist thinking at a moment when feelings of defeat are rather unhelpful to any cause trying to protect people, even if very valid to feel.
Basically their goal is to delay the release until Jan. 20th (inauguration), when Trump's DOJ will bury it for him. The legal system is chock full of ways to delay things, just ask for a ruling on something and BAM, automatic delay. So they filed a motion asking the release to be delayed until the federal appeals court in Atlanta makes a decision on what will happen to Trump's two co-defendants:
source
Thanks so much, this is exactly the kind of information I was looking for. This still sucks but it at least makes more sense.
She had zero power or authority over this case and more importantly over the DOJ. This order goes against separation of powers, no matter how much people would like that home, it's still a thing.
Great breakdown from a former federal prosecutor