this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
272 points (98.9% liked)

News

23770 readers
3596 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon temporarily blocked the release of special counsel Jack Smith's report on Donald Trump's criminal cases.

The injunction will last until three days after the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rules on a related case involving Trump co-defendants Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira.

Nauta and De Oliveira argue that releasing the report could jeopardize their right to a fair trial.

Cannon, who previously ruled Smith's appointment unconstitutional, issued the order to "preserve the status quo" pending appellate decisions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You will find no satisfactory answers. The oligarchy has abandoned the pretense of the rule of law. It's a scary time to be alive.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I know it won't be satisfactory, but I'm still looking for someone who understands how these legal mechanisms are supposed to work to talk me through it. I simply don't have the legal education to be making a more informed statement, and clearly neither does anyone else here.

While it's easy to shout "Oligarchy!" the details still fucking matter.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There literally isn't a reason.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Ok and I personally think that attitude is gonna help Republicans memory hole how things actually worked in the past by throwing up your hands and giving up instead of trying to find out details.

But you do you man, I'm still gonna at least try to find out things, even if the only thing it helps is having one more person remember how systems were supposed to function and continues talking about it to others.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I hear you, and I understand where you're coming from. But there literally isn't a legal argument for any of it. The SCOTUS has been corrupted and has invalidated their own credibility, and corrupt judges and politicians have been handing down legally indefensible rulings for years. Their justification is "fuck you. What are you gonna do about it?"

Legal systems must be consistent to be valid. Selective application of legal reasoning has exposed our courts to malfeasance. It is rotten at the core, and any justice handed down is unintended coincidence.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The reason is that many people are not doing their jobs. Cut and dry end of story.

I both understand and empathize with your search for meaning here, but that is the meaning.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I understand and empathize with the perspectives in reply to this as well, I just think its defeatist thinking at a moment when feelings of defeat are rather unhelpful to any cause trying to protect people, even if very valid to feel.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Basically their goal is to delay the release until Jan. 20th (inauguration), when Trump's DOJ will bury it for him. The legal system is chock full of ways to delay things, just ask for a ruling on something and BAM, automatic delay. So they filed a motion asking the release to be delayed until the federal appeals court in Atlanta makes a decision on what will happen to Trump's two co-defendants:

That court is considering whether to resurrect the classified documents case against Trump’s two co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira. They argued in legal motions Monday and Tuesday that releasing Smith’s report could unfairly prejudice them if they are ever brought to trial. Trump tacked onto their request, arguing that releasing the report is not in the public interest and that the negative attention it would receive could impede his presidency.

source

Thanks so much, this is exactly the kind of information I was looking for. This still sucks but it at least makes more sense.