this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
71 points (78.4% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2327 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You have such a misunderstanding of government if you think federal funding allocation is not fundamental change

Giving handouts to corporations is par for the course. Not a fundamental change.

Durr, unless ALL medications can be free, it’s a worthless bill!

I guess since you have proven completely incapable of debunking anything I've actually said, making shit up is a great alternative.

Another complete misunderstanding of government powers, of course it had to be with bipartisan medications, do you not think the house and senate wouldn’t filibuster over broad sweeping healthcare changes?

You have a poor grasp on the idea of "fundamental change." You seem to be of the opinion that it means "pissing about at the edges and doing as little as possible." Also, the House has no filibuster and the Senate could have eliminated the filibuster forever at any time with a simple majority vote, which is all it takes to alter Senate rules.

What would you have preferred Biden do in Ukraine?

Been more supportive than he was. But I'm not going to pretend that what he did for Ukraine is in any way a deviation from the norm. It was not a fundamental change.

And a strong economy directly tied to the Build Back Better Act gets a “no” from you. Good one.

Considering BBB didn't pass, yeah. I don't give credit for non-accomplishments.

I could go through each of your shithouse Biden demands

You asked, and I provided a list of broken promises. If Biden wanted to say he kept his word, he should have kept his word.

but as soon as I saw a federal wage increase I knew you had no grasp on the role of federal government.

"You don't know how government works" is just what centrists say when they're wrong. You've said some variant of it three times in this comment alone.

Why should the minimum wage in Utah be the same as California?

Well, that wasn't the position I stated. Wages should go up because prices have gone up without a wage increase since 2009.

Now to address your strawman directly: An hour of a person's life is not worth less in Utah. No matter how much you think that that person is worth less.