this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
95 points (94.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35800 readers
1312 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And what would happen if we did?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

While the ultra wealthy don't have billions on hand, they do take loans against their assets, which we could tax more.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Why? Are any loans ever taxed?

There were tax evasion schemes in the UK where wealthy people could take loans from an offshore entity they contributed to and never pay the loans back. But this was shutdown fairly quickly by HMRC (British IRS) and a bunch of people were fined / went to jail. Don't know if the same is true in America?

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

If a loan is acting as income (like it does for the ultra wealthy) then it should be treated like income and taxed accordingly.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And what exactly is the difference between a loan and a loan acting as income?

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

Those loans are often several times more than the yearly income and done more frequently.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

How do you establish that a loan is or isn't "acting as income"?

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

Those loans are often several times more than the yearly income and done more frequently.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Should. They should be taxed extremely heavily to try and stop that loop hole and abuse of power.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

What about loans against assets like houses? I wouldn't consider simple house owners necessarily rich and they should be able to get a mortgage without penalty.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Exclude a mortgage for your primary residence, capped at the median house price or something... And only exclude it IF it is paid back in full over a max period.

This is the case in the Netherlands.. paid back in full after max 30 years... No cap in how much. This was because the interest on the mortgage are tax deductible. So some bankers figured.. we keep the loan maxed, and put your paybacks in a special fund.. and at the end of the 30 years the fund pays back the mortgage. That way we get max interests and you get max tax break. In the end the banks made a lot of public funds private this way.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

You know, you can just do things. Like, laws don't need to be applied unilaterally. You can, at the same time, tax a 100,000,000 dollar loan, and not tax a 1,000,000 dollar loan.

Kind of like how generally, low income people do not pay much or any income taxes, or how certain products are subject to additional sales taxes.