this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
327 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2998 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Following Trump’s election victory, social media saw a surge in misogynistic rhetoric, with phrases like “Your body, my choice” — promoted by figures like white supremacist Nick Fuentes — trending widely.

The Institute for Strategic Dialogue reported a 4,600% spike in misogynistic language on social media and noted that harassment has spilled into schools.

Trump’s win, amplified by Elon Musk’s support, has emboldened “manosphere” influencers, aligning Trump with anti-feminist figures.

This rise in misogyny comes amid other social shifts, such as the election of two Black female senators, a first in U.S. history.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

America voted for Trump, but you're going to blame the people who were working extremely hard to offer a viable alternative?

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump got the same number of votes every election

[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No he didn't. Each election, he's gotten more votes than the prior one.

  • 2016: 63.0 million (46.1% of votes cast)
  • 2020: 74.2 million (46.8%)
  • 2024: 75.8 million (51.3%) - there are still some outstanding votes to be counted, so this will likely go up.
[–] m_f@midwest.social -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Individual people worked hard for that. DNC leadership worked very hard to move to the right and reject progressive/leftist ideals. They proudly touted their endorsements from the Cheneys FFS.

The people voted for change, which Harris wasn't offering.

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's really fascinating how so many online have all the answers, and it would be so easy, and yet, you're not out there doing it

[–] m_f@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The answer is simple. It is not easy. The DNC needs to be replaced ground up with people that push for real change. The hard part is pushing out people in positions of power that don't want to give it up because they benefit from the status quo.

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish you all the luck in gathering voters behind your cause

[–] m_f@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks. The good news is that if I'm right, we both win.

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago

I also hope that those similar to your ideals focus on building you up for your common values, rather than arm chair criticisms while ignoring the deeply problematic other side of the equation.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And your plan to do that is....what?

[–] m_f@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Organizing in person for change and being loud about it. Part of that is helping people direct their anger in the right place by pointing out the problem. It's a lot easier to effect change when you've got a critical mass of people that are pissed off and want the same change.