Pocketpair goes on to say that Palworld has been claimed to infringe on three patents held by Nintendo and The Pokemon Company and that part of the damage is required as compensation.

The first patent is one that most had guessed to be part of the case, as 7545191 refers to the process of capturing and befriending Pokemon, which Palworld apes with its Pal Spheres. The other two patents that are included in the lawsuit, 7493117 and 7528390 haven't been found and detailed just yet, but they're likely also mechanics in Pokemon games that are replicated in Palworld.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 15 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Its so fucked up that Nintendo allegedly owns copyright to CONCEPTS hope they loose it.

[–] Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 7 hours ago

It's not copyright, it's patents...

(I do also hope that they lose because ingame mechanics being patented is bullshit)

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

They had some asshole payents back in the day, like npc giving quests IIRC and the directional cross.

Sony had the "stand up and say mcdonalds to continue the game" IIRC.

Is this US only? Can't imagine it would roll in the EU.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Someone owned a patent for minigames on the loading screen which is why we did not get thise after Broken Sword. At least that expired, so now for example we got Mario Party Jamboree doing it again.

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 4 points 5 hours ago

I think its not even US but Nintendo lobbies so massively that they can uphold Japanese copyright Circus in other countries.

In all sane countries its not possible to parent or copyright a idea or concept just a processes of doing something.