this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
744 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2003 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Since we want the genocide to end before all Palestinians are dead it is not useful to demand that Harris calls the genocide a genocide

Fucking liberalism in a nutshell.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, it's utility. The idea that we can achieve our goals despite not currently having leftists and socialists in power. Not wanting to get your hands dirty isn't even a political position.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No idea how you plan to achieve your goals when your first step is Holocaust denial.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I will wait until she gets elected, and then if she continues to refuse to call it a genocide, then I will hold her accountable then.

But first, the existence of Palestine as contingent on her winning. Like literally.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I will hold her accountable then

By... what mechanism?

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 month ago

Genocide and war aren't mutually exclusive. The Holocaust happened during WWII.

[–] brad_troika@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Juice@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago

So you're looking at a criticism of liberalism, from the left of liberalism. Namely the socialist left, I am assuming. Socialists can be very critical of liberals, as liberalism is a part of the establishment, and has a long history of caving to right wing framing of issues (since the right wing is also (largely) liberalism, albeit "classical liberal." In this case critical of the "its not practical" preconception that gives ground (literally) to the perpetuators of this genocide.

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As opposed to? Conservatism? How do you expect that to be different? Because in terms of president, those are your two options right now.

[–] AmazingWizard@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

As opposed to?

Actual leftism. Liberalism is a Conservative movement.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How do you expect that to be different?

State level electoral reform to replace first past the post voting. Introduce competition into the voting system.