yuki2501

joined 1 year ago
[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (11 children)

following its acquisition from Sony

Has anything good EVER come from big company acquisitions AT ALL?

Geocities -> acquired by Yahoo -> crap -> death

Youtube -> acquired by Google -> ad crap

Blogger -> acquired by Google -> crap

Macromedia -> acquired by Adobe -> Monopoly crap

Washington Post -> acquired by Bezos -> political crap

MySQL -> Acquired by Oracle -> copyright crap

Github -> acquired by Microsoft -> crap

Reddit -> acquired by Conde Nast -> political crap

Twitter -> acquired by Musk -> utter crap

Every single time I see a cool startup get bought by a big player, all I can see is the service going to shit.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's one thing to be uncooperative with Linux development.

A very different thing is to introduce vulnerabilities into existing working code.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay, here's the full explanation for you:

VTubers are simply people using 2D or 3D avatars that move using face tracking technology.

The issue at hand is that many VTubers have skimpy outfits but many of them are classy, i.e. not overly sexual. Furthermore, the content they produce is SFW even if at times they talk or joke about NSFW topics. Most of the time VTubers just engage in chat, gaming or reaction videos. And the official with Twitch's new rules is that changing a VTuber model requires hiring a digital artist and a model animator aka "rigger". These are super expensive, many of those models can cost thousands of dollars to make. So when Twitch days "cover your hips or be banned", VTubers whose models have FROM THE BEGINNING shown hips, now have to pay artists and riggers a huge amount of cash simply to cover themselves up.

To make things worse, Twitch's rules are arbitrary and unpredictable. Who knows if tomorrow they'll have to cover their shoulders? Cover their cleavage? Skirts below the knee? You don't know, and every single time Twitch updates their TOS, VTubers have to spend money just to stay in the business. The least Twitch could do is state a fixed, immutable set of rules so VTubers can design their own outfits without fear of being targeted by Twitch's sharia police. But that doesn't happen. Twitch rules keep changing over and over, but mysteriously they never affect women wearing super tiny bikinis and showing off their sexy bodies in their pools and hot tubs section.

That's the issue. That Twitch's TOS are not only unpredictable, but inconsistently enforced. One could say managers don't like VTubers and engage in these practices to virtually kick them off their platform.

TL;DR: VTubers are NOT porn. And yet, Twitch is selectively enforcing these rules against VTubers while completely allowing exactly the same - or even much more sexualized - content for IRL streamers in their bath tubs and pools section.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago

Intentional? Better use Negligent. It's hard to prove intent; knowledge of something going on is much easier to prove.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Agreed, fantastic story but I'll be damned if I wasn't moved to tears.

Hey, Robin! I know you have to vent sometimes into your works, but give the poor guy a break, won't you?

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (9 children)
  • Hyperion Cantos.

  • Neuromancer.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Precisely to stop people like you, Donald.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Again, WHY ARE YOU NOT CONDEMNING THE COMPANY???

You know you totally sound like a shill, don't you?

I'm not saying you are, I'm just saying that for someone claiming to be a sheep you howl a little bit too much.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Repeat after me: There's a difference between free speech and being a bigot.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Interesting that your first reaction was to condemn the union and not a billion dollar company for laying off their workers after record profits.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Billionaire doesn't give a shit about the working class. News at 11.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Obviously you either didn't read the article or don't care about actors being forced to enact sexual assault scenes. I'd rather think it's the first, because from your response I'd assume that you simply don't care about the actors' well-being and just want your fap material.

Please pay more attention the next time, and at least pretend that you care. This is about informing the actors and getting their consent.

And don't come with that crap about unions; in the game industry unions are practically non existent.

So read the article, twice if necessary; you might learn a thing or two.

 

I know this has been the norm on Twitter, but I'm getting tired of seeing people use mock names like "Melon Usk", "the Muskrat" when referring to Elon Musk, or "the Cheetoh", "the Grump" when talking about Trump, and so on.

First of all, there is no need. There's no central authority in Mastodon who will hide your post because you criticize a notable person.

Second, if you don't want shills to find your post based on the person you criticize, you don't need to worry about it, this is precisely why full-text search is disabled on Mastodon: to protect you from dogpilers.

Third, because distorted names mess up people's filters. I know folks who explicitly add "Elon Musk" or "Trump" to their filters so these posts won't appear in their timelines. By trying to be clever, you accidentally make those people's online experiences worse.

Just use the actual name of the person you're criticizing or insulting and let the filters do their work.

BTW, if you're extra worried about people finding your post, just set your post's privacy mode to followers-only🔒.

Thank you.

 

They finally cut access.

Goodbye, RIF 😢

 

I've spent more than 7 years in Mastodon, and in my experience, new users always come in with a Twitter mindset, then getting a cultural shock because they come to Mastodon expecting a Twitter experience and end up finding something strange and bizarre.

To soften the blow, I'd like to explain the cultural differences between Mastodon and Twitter.

What Twitter was:

  • You could follow microcelebrities (or "influencers") to read interesting things
  • You didn't reach people unless you got lots of likes quickly, so it became a popularity contest
  • The algorithm decides what you read and how you engage, even if it's negative content or something bad for your mental health.
  • Toxic people drew others to quote posting, so it became a yelling competition. You didn't build community, you built followers by standing on a platform and holding a megaphone.
  • Unpopular users just yell to the void.

What Mastodon is:

  • A bunch of communities of people with diverse interests and real lives.
  • Mastodon servers (instances) are careful of who they federate with. Some servers just moderate poorly and there are too many assholes.
  • There are microcelebrities, but they're NOT looking to be popular. They just post the things they do; they're popular because their lives / hobbies are interesting.
  • In Mastodon, you reach people who are actually interested in your stuff. You don't need to game an algorithm. There is no algorithm, people ARE the algorithm.
  • If you don't want to engage with someone, you can block and report. Unlike Twitter, Mastodon admins do take reports seriously (unless it's one of the big instances; then good fucking luck). Reporting is encouraged on Mastodon, it keeps the community clean.
  • Because admins often maintain the server using their own money, it's in their best interest that the community is healthy. (Unless they're assholes, but their instances get blocked quickly)
  • There are no quote posts. You can paste a link to the other person's post, but it is discouraged because we know where that leads.

Longer explanation:

Mastodon has an entirely different culture compared to Twitter. Mastodon was founded and populated by people who believed Twitter was too toxic and corporate-driven. Mastodon is full of gays, transgender folks, sex workers, artists, furries, autistic people, etc.

These people were driven out of the big platforms (Facebook, Twitter) by hate and discrimination. These people have experienced sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, body shaming, etc. in their lives. It follows that the majority of Mastodon is left-leaning, anti-conservative, communist and anti-corporate.

Furthermore: Because it started (or quickly became) as a sort of safe haven for queer folks, they were more open to sincere posting. They post their problems, the discrimination they've experienced; their body dysphoria; depression; homophobia; transphobia and racism. And they give each other support, even economic. In my timeline I see posts asking for emergency money more than once per day.

If you wonder why this doesn't appear on Twitter, it's because the Algorithm filters them out. The public, the customers don't like hearing about people asking for money not to get evicted. They don't like to hear how people were harassed the other day by some karen who believes they're a man in disguise.

But Mastodon is different. People talk about their daily lives because they know their followers will receive 100% of their posts. This is how communities are built.

Mastodon is not, and never aimed to be a Twitter replacement. It was meant to be something different; a place where you could form communities and build connections without Big Brother examining you or deciding how you should behave online.

So the next time you look for "interesting people to follow", it could be possible that you're entering Mastodon with a Twitter mindset. No Toto, we're not in Kansas anymore.

Start following people you think are interesting in YOUR instance. Then start seeing their boosts and follow people you think are cool. Little by little, expand your network, prune your follows and block / mute people you think are obnoxious, and keep building and shaping your network like a beautiful bonsai tree.

The time you invest on building a network from scratch is worth it: You will meet many interesting people, and you will meet new friends; real friends, not just a series of followers whom you have to entertain.

view more: next ›