vokkez

joined 1 year ago
[–] vokkez@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I genuinely don't understand how they get that Twitter reply and still try to snitch. Why would they give you their boss's phone number if they weren't 100% sure that their boss would be cool with their posts?

[–] vokkez@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And how many dozens of indie games came out that same week whose studios folded afterwards? Or how many devs didn't even release their first games because they ran out of money during development? Or how many smaller studios who were making fun games got irresistible offers from big studios to buy them out? What about the engines that are becoming increasingly more hostile towards devs?

[–] vokkez@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Those were standard military engagements, as in two armies facing off against each other with clear strategic goals. The US had the greatest military force in the world at the time, so obviously they would win in a straight up fight. Where the US military struggled was with insurgency, and they struggled with it again in Afghanistan. When the force you are fighting is able to disappear into the forest, a lot of your advantages get neutralized. You can't drive your tanks through the forest, for example. The ewoks obviously don't work as a 1 to 1 comparison, but fit pretty well with popular perception of the Vietnam war.

[–] vokkez@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Lol literally every single line of that post is absolutely nonsense.

The US is on its last legs though.

Lol in what universe? By way metric is the most powerful nation in the world limping along?

It badly needed this win.

If we badly needed a win we wouldn't be sending 30+ year-old surplus gear. Ukraine would have F-35s instead of the air force trying to pawn off A-10s because we're retiring them and don't want to break them down.

The US falls before Putin dies.

Unless he's a Highlander there's no fucking chance.

[–] vokkez@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What drugs are you on and where can I get some?

[–] vokkez@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This collection is a really good breakdown of how the reputation of Spartan society did a lot to carry them through most battles, and how the actual Spartan society absolutely sucked for everyone. One of the things that really stood out to me in regards to how their reputation carried them was that in hoplite battle, you arranged your army by strength from right to left, meaning the right side of your army is facing the left side of your enemy. Essentially the goal of the left side of your army was to survive while the right side of your army was destroying the left side of theirs. Because of the Spartan reputation, it was common for the left side aligned to face their forces in combat would flee before even engaging, leaving an opportunity for the Spartans to flank their enemies and destroy their armies. So Spartans won a lot of battles not because of their immense military capabilities, but because their enemies would allow them to flank based on reputation.

[–] vokkez@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It's less "surplus" and more stolen. Supply officers figuring out they can sell the gear coming through their post and make multiple times their annual salary from selling them to surplus groups. A lot of poorer countries have that problem, iirc it was a significant part of why the US wasn't willing to supply the Afghan military with tech.