triclops6

joined 1 year ago
[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Stealing that last bit!

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 26 points 5 months ago

Did this happen? Or was this a satirical take on something that happened to women?

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That the one with the Boston diddy?

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

She got the order wrong. She should have started with herself

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Omg yes Good association

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 19 points 8 months ago

Matt hung himself in MY office was a nice touch, like the mug was in on the joke

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

Russell Peters joke

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

What do you mean by dated to fail?

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Legit question like I bought an Epson tank printer. I don't use cartridges. I don't use anything with HP on it right? So if they decide that they want to screw you over but they're not a monopoly, wouldn't we just go elsewhere? How is this a win for them? I just feel like they're digging a hole for themselves

No?

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Legit question like I bought an Epson tank printer. I don't use cartridges. I don't use anything with HP on it right? So if they decide that they want to screw you over but they're not a monopoly, wouldn't we just go elsewhere? How is this a win for them? I just feel like they're digging a hole for themselves

No?

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The problem is the intent behind using her Indian name is SPECIFICALLY to delegitimize her in front of her racist voters.

Trump's playing a dirty game here because he's gone just far enough and has plausible deniability like " what? I just said her real name!"

But there is literally no other purpose for him using her name but to make her voters like her less because they are that type of people.

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Ooh so it's both

Kevon is right, one tax benefit is the cost of the show: whether they cancel it or not they get to write off those expenses, and they get a tax break there

Chris would be correct too though: if Netflix holds the IP as assets on the balance sheet, they'd be held at some present value of expected royalties. When they cancel the show id imagine that asset value takes a shit, that's a write off, so tax benefit there

That said no business does this to make money from the tax asset, you have to lose more than the government gives you back

More likely Netflix is high off it's own farts and thinks just money can make cinema magic and it clearly can't.

view more: next ›