overview for sxt

Certainly more engaging and cohesive than SB and yeah, we have to walk things back from EW. Overall I liked the story but the first half was a bit anemic. I think it would've benefited from playing up the competition/stakes of the succession some more - a bit more intrigue there.

Definitely think it'll land towards SB where the story is hit or miss for people but the post patch stuff is really good.

Music Monday - what have you been listening to? in c/casualconversation@lemm.ee

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I live right next to a venue that hosts concerts during the summer so there's no escaping hearing what's playing most of the time despite the special windows my apartment complex supposedly put in.

A couple days ago they had someone doing some really nice instrumental guitar stuff which I'm always on the lookout for. Turned out to be Hermanos Gutiérrez and I've been really enjoying listening to their stuff since then.

Gamergate’s Legacy Lives on in Attacks Against Kamala Harris in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Every time gamergate continues to be relevant another part of my soul atrophies and falls off

NOOOOO!! in c/chainsawfolk@lemmy.world

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

take me

Deadlock (Valve's Unannounced Title) Passes 12k Peak Players in Closed Alpha in c/games@lemmy.world

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If you've got an extra still I'd be down

what should I put ranch seasoning on? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Directly onto pizza. The end

'How Is This Legal?' Elon Musk's Pro-Trump Super PAC Accused of Voter Deception. in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Dunno if we want to be acting like broken window theory is the answer to anything

11

Issues forwarding traffic through a wireguard connection (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by sxt@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

0 comments fedilink

I am attempting to follow this https://www.procustodibus.com/blog/2022/09/wireguard-port-forward-from-internet to forward traffic from a few ports on a public oracle vps to other ports on my local server through a wireguard connection. Currently I am doing this using rinetd, but I was looking for a more normal way of forwarding traffic. (Also looking to forward UDP traffic at some point.)

After stopping rinetd, adding these rules to the public server's wg config

# packet forwarding
PreUp = sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1

# port forwarding
PreUp = iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i ens3 -p tcp --dport 443 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.144.65.2:8443
PostDown = iptables -t nat -D PREROUTING -i ens3 -p tcp --dport 443 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.144.65.2:8443

# packet masquerading
PreUp = iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o wg0 -j MASQUERADE
PostDown = iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o wg0 -j MASQUERADE

and restarting the wg connection, I'm seeing traffic on the ens3 port but none entering wg0 via tcpdump. I feel like I probably have conflicting iptables rules saved https://pastebin.com/0eNwhNKM but I don't really know enough about whats going on there to fix it. I feel like its probably the wireguard-*-rule ones (created by pivpn possibly?) but I'm not sure.

Edit way later: Ended up just using rinetd for the udp connections. Ubuntu doesn't include the latest version here https://github.com/samhocevar/rinetd which is able to do UDP connections. The docker container RxBrad suggested uses that version within the docker container to make the redirections so it will be roughly equivalent.