regalia

joined 1 year ago
[–] regalia 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it means you have the 5G waves coming out of your ears

[–] regalia 1 points 1 year ago

I like to walk slow for the roleplay

[–] regalia 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

where the rpm file at then

[–] regalia 1 points 1 year ago

This is such an obscure situation that doesn't even need to be solved with blockchain. Look at the article being posted. "Messaging network for safer communications", which now apparently turns to just a single situation where a lawyer needs to send a time sensitive email and needs to prove it was sent? Which again, doesn't actually even solve the problem. In this case, your blockchain ponzi scheme email can easily get caught by a spam filter. You've now turned the use case to some global read receipt system, which is dumb as hell and something nobody needs.

This use case literally does not exist. It can also be solved by a simple email server. A business that wants to keep logs of all their messages being sent out or received can store everything on their server with inbound or outbound emails. If in the super extreme scenario where a lawyer sends an email and the counsel ignores it, they can get in a lot of legal trouble for lying and would just get delayed. They lawyer can also prove they sent an outbound copy on their email server. What do you think needs to be "auditable" in communication? A business sending a damn receipt does not need this solution, that's the end user for their email being valid. A lawyer sending private documents to each other want the literal last thing to be on a fucking public cloud server that is invisibly accessible by any fucking third party. Do you hear yourself? Are you a real person??

Literally none of these obscure scenarios you're trying to come up with even need a blockchain solution. You should recognize how hard you're trying to justify this as it being a dumb fuck solution. Despite all these issues you're apparently inventing, we use our existing technology every day and none of these are issues. You're coming off more like ChatGPT then a normal person.

[–] regalia 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes there is??? Do you know what a read receipt is?

Again, storing messages on the blockchain is a fucking terrible idea. I don't need to store the dumb memes my friends send to each other eternally on the blockchain, nor does anyone give a shit. If it's important enough to want to be saved, you do this new technique called a damn backup.

I don't want to open myself up to my key getting hacked and my entire life history's messages getting leaked. I don't want to open myself to someone stealing my device where my key is stored and having indefinite access to all my past, present, and future data. I don't want to leave my data publicly available with all the metadata and message sizes to see for any unknown third parry, and to who is being sent what to whom. I don't want to be vulnerable to potential encryption breaking techniques in the future. I don't want to deal with the gas cost, the huge amount of latency that would make real time chat unviable, and the insane amount of overhead to solve an already solved problem with an objectively worse solution in every possible way.

These are problems that don't need to be solved with blockchain. Every problem you're suggesting has been solved decades ago and for absolutely free. You are dense as hell and aren't even attempting to look at the already existing technology that has already solved this. Fuck out of here crypto bro.

[–] regalia 0 points 1 year ago

on mastodon, saying anything as a guy is mansplaining

[–] regalia 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what motivation would someone have to randomly run that

also you just added new information to the discussion that you personally did. Can an AI do that?

[–] regalia 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

you can store things encrypted

also do you know what identity keys are? We've solved that decades ago with pgp keys lol

[–] regalia 7 points 1 year ago

These people are more inbred then a pug

[–] regalia 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Somehow I can pretty easily tell AI by reading what they write. Motivation is what they're writing for is big, and depends on what they're saying. Chatgpt and shit won't go off like a Wikipedia styled description with some extra hallucination in their. Real people will throw in some dumb shit and start arguing with u

[–] regalia 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

2SLGBTQI+ is widely used in Canada for people who consider themselves two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning or intersex.

Yeah I don't believe that lol, tf is that nonsense if a term

[–] regalia 1 points 1 year ago

isn't that just multiple personality disorder

view more: next ›