rando895

joined 11 months ago
[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure but a lot of these are infiltrated and dismantled by the Dems/Reps as they are a threat to the states monopoly of authority.

Black Panthers, MLK, BLM. They are all hollowed out one way or another until they cease to exist.

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 months ago

Looks like somebody is in need of a bit of democracy, eh?

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (4 children)

There is a third option, but it's not one found at the ballot box.

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is it possible to have a hoa coup? I think that would be interesting.... Tiny revolutions within hoa's. So small no one cares. Eventually everything is clean, green and healthy before anyone notices. Kind of like when eBay changed its background slowly from yellowish to white.

Lol

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 52 points 7 months ago

What I find interesting is it seems like we are again converging on the same service as cable. Which suggests that the best method of profiting off watching movies/tv at home is to have ad supported entertainment, with a monthly fee.

Once again, the profit motive ruins something good .

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Them: "Gee things are getting bad.... The last time the poor were this bad off heads started rolling.... How did we avoid that? Ohh yeah! Concessions! What if we SAY we want to give them concessions, and then tell the government not to? That should work!"

-The wealthy leeches, enemies of humanity

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think it's better to think of it like this:

How do you make your money? Do you need to make a wage? Or can you let your property (land, buildings, stocks, etc.) be your income?

The real amount doesn't matter, it's whether you have to work to live or not.

If you have to work, you are the working class. If you don't, you are the owner/capitalist class. But your analysis is still somewhat correct: millionaires and small business owners are closer to the working class than billionaires, it does still matter how they make it though.

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 20 points 8 months ago

Exactly. It's how you make your money, not how much you make.

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

Maybe, it sounds familiar. But if past trends are any indication, once enough of the market is dominated by EVs, there will be a lot more money to be made by lowering quality to a bare minimum.

And the infrastructure argument still stands in that case.

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago

They haven't shied away, it is just more profitable to mine outside your borders using slave labour. The fact of it is, with planned obsolescence being the best way to ensure a steady demand of a product, and the environmental destruction required to support the manufacturing and use of EVs, they still are not a solution. They are a market solution which means it is profitable, and a lateral move at best, and a back step at worst.

If EVs help the environment that is secondary.

https://miningwatch.ca/publications/2023/9/6/contemporary-forms-slavery-and-canadian-mining-industry

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

The criticisms are also that companies use slavery to acquire the materials to make EVs. And they don't work well in the cold (see current cold snap in Canada), the lifetime of the batteries aren't great, and we still need to destroy huge swaths of land to create cars, park/store cars, and drive cars.

EVs are only going to save the car industry. To fix it requires a redesign of cities (see Strongtowns, not justbikes, city beautiful, etc.).

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No need, the Soviets made a river of natzi blood in the 40's.

view more: next ›