phthalocyanin

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

"negative peace "

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

toxic positivity/ negative peace aside, I would imagine that not being represented within the established political hegemony could foster some negative emotional response.

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

no. power centralized in the beaurocratic state apparatus is also oppressive. electoral politics are a sham, and democracy is impotent when the capital owning class can simply buy influence.

if 9 people vote to kill the 10th, is that just?

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

itt: those in the priveledged position to rely on the state for defense of self and community would rob others of the ability to enforce their bodily autonomy and community defense.

'only the [fascist] cops should be armed' brain worms,

enforcing the capital owning class' monopoly of violence (against ourselves),

a negative peace at the expense of justice.

you know-- bootlickers.

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

argument through analogy is a logical fallacy, I'm not going to engage that.

you've yet to convince me that further entrenching capitalism (which requires scarcity to the extent that it will create it where there need be none, and demands endless quarterly growth within a limited system) is a solution to the environmental destruction to which it contributes.

it seems to me as though you would like to eat your cake and have it too.

private ownership of capital is a race to the bottom, leading inevitably to unsustainable extraction of natural resources. The latter won't be halted or reversed without abolishing the former.

we need power to be distributed horizontally, not continue to be concentrated in fewer and fewer actors.

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

the non profit industrial complex serves to launder the reputations of the ownership class without meaningfully addressing oppressive systems or threatening the status quo.

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's actually from Hungary, but I'm not going to defend auth apologists lol

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

landlords ought not exist

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"...frustrated at Britain’s attempts to help Ireland during the Irish famine..."

lol. was this written by an English aristocrat?

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

what is generational wealth?

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

incredibly simplistic perspective, and intellectually dishonest; we traded monarchy for a dictatorship of the capital owning class.

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

reactionary recuperation of revolutionary aesthetic-- shallow, reductive simulacrum of class analysis, stripped of systemic critique, intersectionality, and radical solidarity.

conservative pandering. lame af.

 
 
 
 

every problem begins to look like a nail.

the difference between a gun and a cop? when a gun kills someone you know it has been fired.

 
 

and a death cult.

all glory to 'line go up'

 

be careful with each other so we can be dangerous together

view more: next ›