obscura_max

joined 1 year ago
[–] obscura_max@lemmy.world 74 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is very common in speed running for almost any game. Similar exploits are often engine related as well. Once you find an exploit for one source or unreal game, there's a decent chance that other games built on similar versions will share it.

[–] obscura_max@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The model 3 RWD is basically already there in many places, ~$36k pre-tax incentives (Colorado tax incentive brings it down to $31k) and EPA est 272mi range (Out of Spec got 264mi in their 70mph range test). What we really need is something in this class for $20-25k.

[–] obscura_max@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

The picture even looks like the parody version you'd see in the music video.

[–] obscura_max@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Well they've made it pretty clear why they're using this particular steel. The goal is to create a relatively cheap, reusable rocket. The strength of the steel helps make up for the increased density since you can use thinner panels. They also don't have to paint them. This leads to a small difference in total weight.

The compromise they're going for is giving up a slight amount of capacity to decrease cost of materials, increase production volume, and hopefully improve the reusability and lower the total maintenance.

They're not trying to build the highest performance rockets, they want the lowest cost for the level of performance they're targeting. That's not to say it will necessarily work out, but they've obviously done the math on the compromise and think it's beneficial in the long run.

Of the many issues Starship has had, it doesn't seem like the steel skin is one of them. It's just one of a million design choices you have to make for any rocket.

[–] obscura_max@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Ryzen desktop chips use the same compute chiplets as server (server has a long tail for adoption and a steady need for replacement parts), so they have a large supply of chiplets that don't meet server requirements but can be downclocked or given more voltage for desktop. This also fulfills the low end desktop market, so they don't have to produce lower end chips on more expensive nodes. There's also a lot of AM4 platforms that can get a new lease on life with a drop in Zen3 replacement.

Then you also have supply from the laptop side with similar issues (don't meet voltage requirements for efficiency), which is where the APUs come from.

[–] obscura_max@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I had the same experience with the first few oat milks I tried, but after trying a few more, I found a couple I really like that come the closest to mimicking half & half of any non-dairy creamer I've tried. I quite like the Chobani Extra Creamy and recently tried the Planet Oat Barista (when I couldn't find the Chobani) and really enjoyed it. They're both full-bodied and have a good mouthfeel. You'll still get that slight hit of oats, but I find it isn't as distracting when the creaminess is correct. Most non-dairy milk alternatives are just too watery to be enjoyed in coffee.