nvermind

joined 1 year ago
[–] nvermind@lemm.ee 34 points 10 months ago

It’s impressive that every part of this is wrong!

[–] nvermind@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

I visited Molossia a while ago, dude was awesome and super friendly. Plus the weather in Molossia is always perfect, although with the close borders with Nevada sometimes the bad weather from the US bleeds in.

[–] nvermind@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Looked at your profile, you’re in Mexico? Ultimately the question you need to ask yourself is how your political decisions (voting or not voting) impacting others. Like someone else said, if you live in society with others there is no such thing as “not being political”, every action has consequences.

If you want to support a conservative politician who is harming other people from a community you identify with, you need to know that’s what you’re doing and that it has an impact. If you don’t vote to oppose a candidate who harms you community, you also need to be aware of that and recognize that you had a part in making it happen.

Do what you want and identify how you will, but regardless it’s probably going to impact others, positively or negatively.

[–] nvermind@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Well that is a fascinating and bizarre definition.

Where are you? Most US conservatives use socialism as the bogeyman and practically a swear word.

[–] nvermind@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] nvermind@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly! In the report, the companies that do have meaningful goals of at least 80% emissions reductions by 2030 do WAY better than the rest of the companies! But a 2050 goal is meaningless, and “net” zero by 2050 is even more meaningless because they can claim to fill it with carbon capture or carbon credits.

view more: ‹ prev next ›