neatchee

joined 1 year ago
[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not entirely sure what about this you have a problem with?

On its face, the statement seems reasonable.

What am I missing?

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, no, not really. They are absolutely able and willing to confiscate your devices at any time once you're on Chinese soil, and once you've lost physical control, that's the end of trust for that device. Even beyond that, it's not unheard of for there to be vulnerabilities in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc that make your device susceptible to wireless attacks. IMO it's not worth the risk.

Here is just one example of this type of thing uncovered by The Guardian, New York Times, and others in a joint investigation: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/02/chinese-border-guards-surveillance-app-tourists-phones

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Do not bring your normal personal devices to China. They are notorious for injecting spyware on foreign devices at every opportunity. Use a freshly formatted device and create all new accounts to use with it.

Regarding services: do not use self-hosted services unless you you spin up fresh, isolated instances of your services for use while abroad and spin them down afterwards, including formatting any OS they were hosted on.

Regarding VPN: because we are assuming that any device used in China is compromised, do not connect to your VPN unless you have set up a segregated VLAN and are connecting through a VPN server instance created specifically for use while in China.

Basically, assume anything you use in China is compromised. And assume your connections are being monitored. And assume that any device you are connecting to from China is at risk of being compromised. So everything needs to be segregated from the rest of your network and set up specifically to be deleted after you're back home.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yikes. That's a LOT of money to be received ~weekly from an international source.

That means this has been going on for 2-4 months

This amount of money is likely to be reported to tax authorities if it hasn't been already.

Is your son a talented artist of some kind? Musician? Video editor? Anything that might get them a contract job online that could be billed in different amounts each week? (A typical job would pay the same amount every week, whereas if they're billing for "hours worked" it will be different each time)

I'm trying to be as generous as possible with explanations but I think you are right to be concerned (unless your son has a reason he would hide money from you, like a history of having his possessions disrespected or taken from him)

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They wind up broke, sure, because the house always wins in the end. But that doesn't mean they're broke all the time. Winning is what makes it addicting in the first place. You're up $100. Then you're up $1000. Then you're down $2000. That's how it works

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (5 children)

There are several possibilities unrelated to lovers. As others have mentioned, cryptocurrency is likely. Selling drugs is also possible. Organized crime in China is very real so it could be other things besides drugs.

It could also be a relatively legitimate side-hustle. Art, music, or video production could yield this kind of money for a big project, especially over time.

If they're not paying taxes, this is a problem no matter what. That is too much money for the banks to not take notice and report on it. This needs to be addressed either way.

How much are "big transactions"? That will help us understand what kind of payments are being received.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I would love to see the list of Republicans in Congress whose districts/states WEREN'T carried by pro-Trump zealots and who WOULDN'T lose their seats if they went against Trump.

Hint: it could fit on an index card, double spaced

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Stack Overflow mods finally get what they've always dreamed of: no more repeat questions.

StackGPT: begins every answer with "closed as duplicate. Here's a previous answer I provided to this question..."

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I would like you to direct me to any images or posts on fedi or similar that instruct people to call the numbers provided INSTEAD of calling government authorities

Because while your post explicitly calls out the instructions in these image as being wrong, giving the specific impression that people should call the numbers you provided and NOT political orgs (because you speak very critically of the political orgs, insinuating they should not be called), every post I've seen with political org numbers has simply provided the information without additional comment

Your initial post reeks of manipulation in an effort to drive people away from the political orgs.

Those orgs serve a very specific purpose that is NOT covered by the state and federal offices you've told people to call. Those government offices are not a replacement for the services provided by the political orgs and you should not be presenting them as if they are

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Recounts do not include submitting new votes.

And either way, good luck getting a partisan controlled office to institute a recount or re-vote in the current political climate.

You are gambling on the hope that the problem gets fixed later. This is a terrible idea.

And local election offices - often under partisan control - have no obligation to assist individuals in getting their ballot cast.

You are either being extremely naive to the realities on the ground, or intentionally disingenuous.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The gift isn't the crime.

Telling people you're holding a sweepstakes, collecting their information based on that statement, and then not holding the sweepstakes and instead giving the supposed prize to someone of your choice is the crime

It's called fraud

 

Ado RuLe rules rule

 
 
view more: next ›