namnnumbr

joined 1 year ago
[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

https://yetch.store/products/every-day-goal-calendar For a physical/digital device. … way more expensive than I remember it being (especially given it’s single-user), but it’s a pretty good incentive to keep up with less-fun habits

[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago

Authy is lovely in that it just works, but it is hellacious to migrate off of if you change your mind.

I also don’t love that Authy is owned by Twilio, a communications/marketing service company.

[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A password manager can be considered critical infrastructure; beyond privacy and uptime/access considerations, you should also consider what happens if you lose all of your data - Do you have backups? Are the backups 3-2-1 redundant? Do you have a ready-to-go docker compose to get yourself up and running locally in a pinch?

I self-hosted bitwarden (vaultwarden) for several years and it became evident to me that it was important enough to use the hosted service - especially as I was already paying Bitwarden to support their open source business.

[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

https://www.zimaboard.com/

recent blog from hacker news

I can’t personally attest to the “easy to use self hosting OS” since I immediately installed Ubuntu (soon to be Debian) but the hardware is good and the preinstalled OS should let you get a feel for things.

[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

I think I get what you’re after now. I’ll have to think on this further - interesting problem!

[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

IMO there is a difference between adding “knowledge” and adding “facts”. You can fine tune in domain knowledge but it will be prone to hallucination. To ground the instructions, you’d need to introduce RAG for fact lookup; possibly with a summarization step if you want to bring in large bodies of facts.

[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (7 children)

I don’t think fine tuning works the way you think it does; one does not generally fine tune to “add facts”. This might be useful: https://nextword.substack.com/p/rag-vs-finetuning-llms-what-to-use

I’d advocate for using the RAG pattern to do the lookups for the new facts. If needed, you can fine tune the model on top to output for your specific domain or format.

[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That’s fair; I guess it depends on what your threat model is — kind of like how using a vpn can just expose you to your vpn service while ostensibly protecting you from your service provider.

To me, the improved search results from kagi and the disconnect between search and ad-and-tracking companies are worth it. But that may not be a fit for anyone else.

[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I strongly advocate for Kagi. Yes, it’s paid search, but it means that there is no tracking or ad revenue concerns obfuscating the search results.

[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

IIRC, the biggest issue with TrueNAS SCALE + Docker is that they really run the containers on a 'hidden' kubernetes cluster and obfuscate the standard docker and docker-compose way of doing things behind a gui with limited customization and poor field descriptions.
I found it much easier to spin up a VM on SCALE and run docker through that, although then you have to deal with multilayer networking.

... To be fair, this was when SCALE was still in beta, so it has possibly improved since then.

[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 91 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not just every tech company, it's every company. And it's terrifying - it's like giving people who don't know how to ride a bike a 1000hp motorcycle! The industry does not have guardrails in place and the public consciousness "chatGPT can do it" without any thought to checking the output is horrifying.

[–] namnnumbr@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd recommend OPNsense over PFsense due to multiple shady moves by netgate (the parent company of pfsense), including moving to closed-source:

If you don't mind the drama, both PFsense and OPNsense are perfectly competent router OSes.

Regarding hardware:

  • OPNsense also sells rack-mountable server hosts.
  • OP may not actually need a rack-mounted server -- I have several machines just sitting on a 2u rack-mounted shelf. My opnsense install runs on a cheap protectli box, and there's enough room for a handful of raspberry pis and their power bricks on the shelf next to it.
view more: next ›