michaelmrose

joined 1 year ago
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

They thought they needed to also earn the majority which supports Israel as well which makes it awful hard to tell the truth and win everyones votes

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They want to pass a law that says you have to get the majority of the majority of counties and they have 256 mostly small rural counties some with less than 100 people in them.

I did the math and you could hold the majority of the majority with as little as 4% of the vote.

If you try to be cute and take over a bunch of small counties the law could just be further amended or you know they could just not find your bodies.

I'm staying in blueland

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Recipe for outright disaster as duplication of shit gets way out of control. We have too much already.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

How about selecting reps independently from home state in a national election. Every million people get to send someone from anywhere. The dakotas can share one

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The rich economy actually contributes

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

If we required an IQ test and general knowledge test equally of all parties and eliminated all those who don't know anything about what's going on and those 10% or more below average we would have a better run country save for the Republicans revolting and committing acts of terrorism.

If we divided the country all the rurals would have the option of moving to Trumpistan

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The only people who say this know nothing about quantum or computers

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

It's a mistake to imagine most regulation is just brainless nonsense. It would be like imagining the entire legal industry is composed of burglars suing home owners because they slipped in the kitchen whilst robbing the house and concluding we could easily do away with it.

Looser regulations is incredibly unlikely to effect only or even mostly the stupid or even only or even mostly the poor. Firstly the primary food supply for rich and poor right up to the 1% generally comes from the same ultimate sources the rich just A) mix some more expensive stuff in B) have people who fetch and prepare the food for them.

Also people are incredibly laughably bad at enacting food safety by voting with their feet even when a particular restaurant is making people sick. Oftentimes the actual sickness may take days to manifest and may not be connected obviously with the ultimate source. Now that is for things that at least directly sicken people. Things that are merely unhealthy may have an ultimate effect that is only visible at the population level where you see significantly more people get cancer in the next 10 to 20 years.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

People who vote dem are almost as likely to own a gun as right wingers outside of your fantasies and imaginary friends

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Imagine another 20 years of surveillance tech improvements. We are already fucked if we can't turn this around in 20

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (6 children)

If you are rejected by all of western women maybe just maybe something is wrong with you my incel friend.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You are assuming that the children of trad wives born into a culture that offers a far better deal choose on average to become tradwives. You are also ignoring how small a group it is and all the other larger groups are that also have big families. Lastly you are ignoring how short fads are and how long generations are.

If you start with 3% tradwives and grow 33% per generation you are going to be very disappointed in 60 years when its only 7% even more so if expected losses to other cultural options keep it at 4% or even extict.

view more: next ›