this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
496 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2916 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

US Muslim leaders who supported Republican Donald Trump to protest against the Biden administration’s support for Israel’s war on Gaza and attacks on Lebanon have been deeply disappointed by his cabinet picks, they tell Reuters.

“Trump won because of us and we’re not happy with his Secretary of State pick and others,” says Rabiul Chowdhury, a Philadelphia investor who chaired the Abandon Harris campaign in Pennsylvania and co-founded Muslims for Trump. Muslim support for Trump helped him win Michigan and may have factored into other swing state wins, strategists believe.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 7 points 6 hours ago

We tried to fucking warn them.

They can suffer through this hell the same way the rest of us do, only they get to know they caused it.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

Got exactly what they voted for.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

What did they think they would vote for? How stupid can one be?

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I refuse to believe that people would be stupid enough to expect somebody who banned people from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from even entering the USA in his first term to be pro-Gaza...

Nah, I actually think minorities voted more for Trump because the right have more socially conservative policies.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

That’s what I believe as well. Far left social issues should not be at the forefront of the campaign. Majority of Hispanic people I spoke to said they voted for trump either because economy, or because they didn’t agree with the Dems stance on trans rights. I’m all for equality but there are more pressing matters than which bathroom a person can use or should trans people be allowed to compete in a certain sport. Let the state decide and move on. Stop alienating the majority of Americans for less than 5% of the population.

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 9 points 17 hours ago

Love the blaming of Muslims instead of the mass uninformed…

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 32 points 23 hours ago (11 children)

It's almost like people were told a million times that Trump didn't acknowledge Palestine existed and that Kamela wanted a ceasefire

[–] hark@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

Kamela wanted a ceasefire

So did biden, reportedly.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Leopards ate my face, example #5937719

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

All this reporting reminds me of the "But actually this Man on The Street Hated Brexit even though he voted for it" slew of stories.

It's all just nutpicking. You'll find far more Muslim Trump voters who don't know who any of these people are. And you'll find plenty who are clapping like seals, because they're just as Murdoch Pilled and MAGA headed as their white peers.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Which just goes to show the lack of critical thinking skills in a shockingly large swath of the population.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 28 points 1 day ago
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Behind door #1: Isn't as one-sided as you regarding a war in another country that involves your religion.
Behind door #2: Tried to enact laws that openly discriminate against your religion just a few years ago. And is also totally one-sided against you regarding that same war.

It's a tough choice.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Behind door #1: Isn’t as one-sided as you regarding a war in another country that involves your religion.

They're way more one-sided about the "war" (genocide) than I imagine the vast majority of Muslim and pro-Palestinian voters are, just in the wrong direction. What part of unconditionally supplying weapons to a country that is indiscriminately slaughtering civilians is "not one sided," oh "rational_lib?"

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It's not one-sided because Trump is what one-sided looks like. Democrats still support trying for a Palestinian state, while Trump wants Israel to not stop at Gaza but take what remains of the West Bank too. You don't get to define the sides the way you want, we're still dealing with the American public here - and the American public is very anti-muslim and militaristic (I mean we do have to live in a world where 9/11 happened - which, by the way, was one of the more egregious examples of the counter-productive effect of attempts to make Americans care about Palestine).

I'm the last to justify continuing aid to Israel, but if you don't understand the political difficulty of removing that aid you're just not paying attention. This will be seen as a win for Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah and the backlash will be massive with lots of accusations that Democrats are embracing anti-semetism. And Democrats know from past causes like BLM that the same people advocating very forcefully for changing policy will morph into crickets when it comes time to defend those changes from backlash, having moved on to more exciting causes. So yeah, I disagree with aid to Israel but I can't really blame them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago

...Don't vote for Trump then?!??

If you're at this point still upset or surprised about anything the orange moron does, you're part of the problem.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never thought leopards would eat my face!

load more comments (1 replies)

shocking, really.

In other news, stupid people are baffled by their own stupidity.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We're gonna see a lot more "Experts baffled Trump did x thing" and the word "unprecedented" show up in headlines again for at least the next four years. Sleep in the bed you made, fuckwads.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›