livingcoder

joined 1 year ago
[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 1 points 15 minutes ago

I've literally sat down in city centers surrounded by buildings. It's an amazing feeling.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 3 points 16 minutes ago

I wish I could experience that. I wish our sci-fi fairytales of space travel were happening now. Alas, I must simply exist in a life lived better than a king of old, living longer than our ancestors, with food untasted by the billions before us, and all while I fly around in space within Eve Online while watching Star Trek. Life is great, but it's so easy to want it to be just that much better.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What did he whisper in her ear?

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago

The runoff voting downside is incorrect, the "drag the voters up to yellow and watch how it makes red win" example. This is not "see how making yellow more popular makes yellow lose". It's actually "see how making red more popular than yellow makes red win". The movement of the voters is not for yellow, but for red and yellow in a way that gives more voters to red.

There is no way for yellow to be the only candidate to get a boost of voters in the demo. If there were, it would only demonstrate further that yellow would still continue to win.

Runoff voting is the way.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago

He gave them the weapons and is STILL giving them weapons today knowing exactly how they're being used. "We're trying to hard to stop this" while handing them the bombs they need to continue uninterrupted.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago

They say it just tastes better. idk. I'm going to try it soon.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 10 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Someone just suggested to me that I should be putting my chocolate bars in the freezer first. I've never heard of this, but apparently it's a thing that I've been missing out on for a while.

So I guess I'm the one who can't believe that I don't do it.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

After watching Pocahontas for the first time in many years, it shocked me that anyone could value personal wealth over coexisting. The antagonist only cares about mining out gold, looking at the hills as having potential as opposed to perceiving them as implicitly valuable as they are. Nature is worth protecting.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

I loved both of these games as a kid.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, okay. Thank you for clarifying. So doesn't that mean we should never have a compiler written in the same language that it compiles? Why would we ever choose to make the mistake of using the same language? Is it ever not a mistake?

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Why would a Rust compiler written in C be more trustworthy than one written in Rust?

If the idea is that, in an ideal world, we would compile each layer of compilers from assembly-up-to-Rust for each build, that seems even more risky as then you have to trust each compiler instead of just one.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 17 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I'm still lost on why they're doing it.

view more: next ›