jaykrown

People don't like downloading things unless they absolutely have to. It immediately puts a weight against anyone using what you've created. With web based, there's nothing to download, and it works on any platform that can run a browser.

"super low-cost"

"Honda hasn’t revealed a timeline or pricing yet"

🥴

True, I appreciate the correction, the actual data transfer speed is determined by the USB version.

USB-C will be around for a long time, it's a strong standard. Wireless inductive charging won't take over for a long time because it's limited in speed, and WiFi/Bluetooth are much slower for data transfer.

There's still too much work to be done.

It's as simple as "correlation does not imply causation".

I wonder if it has something to do with this:

"users who turn to popular chatbots when exhibiting signs of severe crises risk"

Blaming the chatbot doesn't seem like the smartest perspective, the title is fucking bullshit.

Yea this is a good point. I think bicycles should be required to have some lights at least to make them more visible to drivers.

My question stems from the fact that certain areas expect cyclists to share the road with cars while drivers are protected by higher safety standards, and cyclists are exposed to a higher level of danger.

Yea I guess it comes to the infrastructure, I'm in Chicago and we seriously need more REAL bike lanes, not something just painted on the road. I see drivers doing crazy shit all the time swerving into bike lanes almost hitting cyclists. I'm just really still confused about the logic of forcing cyclists to ride on the road where there are no bike lanes while the side walks are wide enough for them.

Safety standards like seat belts, airbags, turn signals, brake lights. Things that protect the individual operating the vehicle.

That makes sense, so why aren't bikes allowed on the side walk? Based on your argument.