Yes, based on many. However, that implies that people don't care about the genocide, which is what ive repeatedly said.
If you want to be more precise, they cared about everything else more, which is a different way of saying they don't care about it.
They rejected the other candidates and now have nobody, so they are back at square one. It’s no worse for them as it would be for a person, but they have systematised it and are used to the upper hand. In the case of rejection, they lose their system and the upper hand.
No, I’m saying that as the only party to be anti genocide, if Australians cared about it as an issue, their votes would have increased, not decreased.
On a GendARM
This is a step towards indicating they might, or at least remove their favoured trade,
It becomes harder not to sanction Israel if the reason for the deal break is crimes against humanity.
Yes, especially tricking kids into surgery, despite all the research saying transgender surgery is less regretted than many successful cancer surgeries. And despite the fact that usually gender affirming care for kids is puberty blockers to allow them to make a firm decision when they are older. In fact, to help prevent the fact that kids are more suspceptible to persuasion and confusion.
My Donald’s and the like? Shorter shifts when younger.
The point is, though, that with ever decreasing quality, the line doesn’t keep going up.
Mindhunter was also great, but rather than losing their audience with huge gaps, they lost their showrunner and cast.
House of cards and mindhunter came from Netflix trying to give money to people that knew how to make quality shows and not interfering. Then they decided a different strategy of trying to appeal to lots of different demographics with low quality shlock. It destroyed the quality of everything. Now Netflix original means terrible, like direct to video was in the past.
No, I'm pointing out, again, about the reduction of votes they got. They are the only party with the potential for seats to support ending genocide. They had less votes and lost seats.
I'm not saying it was their only issue but it clearly wasn't an important issue for Australians based on that.
If it was important to Australians, more would have voted for the greens. Australians either didn't care or supported genocide instead.
It's not like the USA where it was a hold your nose situation. We have preferential voting. If people cared about other issues, they could still preference the greens for their genocide stance, of they deemed it important. they did not.