h_ramus

joined 1 year ago
[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Awesome! New single released before the album release in October.

[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

The company routinely shifted production of concentrate to countries with favourable tax rates

Manufacturing is different than IP transfers.

the US parent company that owns the iconic brands. By controlling how much the subsidiaries must pay other parts of the Coke network for use of the brands and marketing, and by setting the prices they can charge bottlers, Coke itself in effect decided their profitability, the court heard

IP is owned by the US. What they're describing is transfer pricing. Subsidiaries are owned by coke hence by definition coke sets the prices under which the US charges for their IP. It's tax advantageous to charge a low amount to shift profits to low tax jurisdictions.

Numbers look massive but overall not large enough. Coke is gigantic and the dispute spans multiple years. The IRS hasn't always covered themselves in glory and they may still fumble a technical aspect on the burden of proof.

Interesting to see it unfold but coke has a history of environmental, business and humane malpractices. This is just another outcome of such business model.

[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The intangible property for coke is a secret recipe that is preserved in some vault in the US. There's no transfer of IP here and that's not what's in dispute.

The facts are centred around the profitability of concentrate producers that earn the super profits. Operating entities and the US makes a slim margin.

You can read a better informed analysis here.

[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nothing beats a glass of water. Plus, coke has a history of business, environmental and humane malpractices.

[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee 120 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Didn't bother going through the hoops and installed EndeavourOS which is arch-based with some additional default applications.

For me, the best thing of Arch isn't the distribution but the Arch wiki. An impressive piece of documentation.

[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago

No. Takes two seconds to open or close the tap. However, I do sometimes spend time daydreaming under running water so I guess it evens out!

[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

I had issues with Manjaro and WiFi disconnecting. Also, Manjaro dropped hardware acceleration for video codecs. Eventually got too annoyed to deal with the Manjaro direction and moved to EOS. Everything is working fine barring a script to get the headphones volume to work (recognised as bass speaker in alsa paths). So far, EOS has been the set and forget type of OS for me.

[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

That doesn't seem to be an insignificant GME long view...

[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Windows runs my laptop harder, uses more battery and the fans are spinning a lot of times whist it runs almost silent in Linux. I've settled on EndeavourOS which has given me a headache-free experience for my hardware (lenovo yoga pro 7 7840hs). Only keep widows for BIOS updates otherwise I'd have nuked that hodge podge of software melange.

If you're really set on windows you could try tiny11 to remove most of the bloat.

[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Very on-brand for Ocon. Seems more interested in protecting his fragile ego whenever a teammate out qualifies him than playing the team game. In Monaco, this is evidence that there's no limit to human stupidity. Outdid KMag on brainless decision.

[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, hello there Don Draper

[–] h_ramus@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The efforts should be placed on the aspects that have greater impact on health. Focusing on cigarettes when alcohol has a much larger impact seems an odd prioritisation.

Also, banning something doesn't mean that the problem is solved. Drugs aren't allowed but it's easier and cheaper to pop a few happy pills on a night out than it is to drink until oblivion.

This seems more a chest pumping measure to score cheap political points. There's no political will to tackle the bigger and more important problem as it requires additional skill and likely to be less popular.

I'm all for reducing smoking but this is unlikely to achieve any meaningful change. Happy to be proven wrong though.

EDIT: https://feddit.uk/post/10757641

view more: next ›